Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

07:29
Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Three-Year Corneal Biomechanical Outcomes Assessed by CORVIS ST Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging After Epithelium-Off
Radu Nicolae Pop1,2, Cristina Nicula1,3, Patricia Nicula1
1OCULENS Ophthalmology Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology
|May 18, 2026
Summary
Both conventional and accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) effectively stabilize keratoconus long-term. While final outcomes were similar, the stiffness trajectory showed subtle differences, suggesting irradiation duration impacts corneal stiffening over time.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Biomechanical Engineering
Background:
- Progressive keratoconus requires effective treatment to prevent vision loss.
- Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a standard treatment, with conventional and accelerated protocols available.
- Understanding long-term biomechanical and tomographic changes is crucial for treatment optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term (36-month) corneal biomechanical and tomographic outcomes of epithelium-off conventional CXL (C-CXL) versus accelerated CXL (A-CXL) in progressive keratoconus patients.
- To analyze dynamic corneal response parameters using Scheimpflug imaging.
- To evaluate the influence of irradiation duration on corneal stiffening.
Main Methods:
- Prospective comparative study of 63 eyes from 40 patients with progressive keratoconus.
- Epithelium-off CXL performed using either conventional (3 mW/cm² for 30 min) or accelerated (9 mW/cm² for 10 min) protocols, both delivering 5.4 J/cm² total fluence.
- Corneal parameters including Kmax, visual acuity, pachymetry, and dynamic Scheimpflug (Corvis ST) parameters (DA, A1T, A2T, PD, HC radius, SP-A1, BAD-D) assessed at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
- Statistical analysis included Welch's t-test and repeated-measures modeling.
Main Results:
- Both C-CXL and A-CXL demonstrated significant longitudinal biomechanical remodeling and clinical stabilization over 36 months (p < 0.001 for key parameters).
- No statistically significant between-group differences were observed at 36 months for Kmax, visual acuity, pachymetry, or most dynamic corneal response parameters (p > 0.05).
- A significant time × group interaction was found for the stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1) (p=0.042), indicating a modest protocol-dependent divergence in stiffness trajectory over time.
Conclusions:
- Both epithelium-off conventional and accelerated CXL provide sustained biomechanical remodeling and clinical stabilization for progressive keratoconus over three years.
- While overall 36-month outcomes were comparable, the study highlights that matched total fluence does not guarantee identical biomechanical time courses.
- Irradiation duration appears to influence the pattern and trajectory of postoperative corneal stiffening, even when total energy is consistent.
Keywords:
A-CXL = Accelerated cross-linkingA1T, A2T = First and second applanation timesAPLANO-T = Applanation tonometryBAD-DBAD-D = Belin/Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Total Deviation IndexC-CXL = Conventional cross-linkingCBI = Corvis biomechanical indexCCT = Central corneal thicknessCDVA = Corrected distance visual acuityCXL = Cross-linkingCorvis STD = DiopterDA = Deformation amplitudeDCR = Dynamic corneal responseHC radius = Highest concavity radiusKCN = KeratoconusKmax = Maximum keratometryPD = Peak distanceSP-A1 = Stiffness parameter at first applanationUCVA = Uncorrected visual acuityUVA = Ultraviolet Aaccelerated CXLbIOP = Biomechanically corrected intraocular pressurebiomechanicsconventional CXLcorneal cross-linkingdeformation amplitudekeratoconusstiffness
