Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Three-Dimensional Force System01:30

Three-Dimensional Force System

In mechanical engineering, a three-dimensional force system is a system of forces acting in three dimensions, with forces applied along the x, y, and z coordinate axes. The three-dimensional force system is an important concept in mechanical engineering, as it allows engineers to understand and analyze the behavior of objects and structures in three dimensions. By understanding the forces acting on a system, engineers can design more efficient and effective mechanical systems that can withstand...
Two-Dimensional Force System01:20

Two-Dimensional Force System

A two-dimensional system in mechanical engineering involves the analysis of motion and forces in a plane. A two-dimensional force vector can be resolved into its components as:
Two-Dimensional Force System: Problem Solving01:29

Two-Dimensional Force System: Problem Solving

Solving problems related to two-dimensional force systems is an essential aspect of mechanics and engineering. By applying the principles of vector analysis and force equilibrium, one can determine the effect of multiple forces acting on an object in a two-dimensional space.
The first step to solving a two-dimensional force system problem is to draw a free-body diagram of the object under consideration. This diagram helps identify all the external forces acting on the object, including their...
Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interaction Analysis using the Cambridge Structural Database - rapid access to intermolecular hydrogen-bond frequencies and uses for coformer selection.

Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials·2026
Same author

Accelerated drug development using a digital formulator and a self-driving tableting data factory.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Combining experiment and prediction to explore surface chemistry and dissolution.

IUCrJ·2025
Same author

Spatial and Temporal Visualization of Polymorphic Transformations in Pharmaceutical Tablets.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2024
Same author

An integrated approach combining experimental, informatics and energetic methods for solid form derisking of PF-06282999.

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences·2024
Same author

The seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction: structure ranking methods.

Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies
07:31

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies

Published on: September 1, 2023

A benchmark study of force fields implemented in CSD software.

Lily M Hunnisett1, Pietro Sacchi1, Andrew G P Maloney1

  • 1The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ UK.

Structural Chemistry
|May 19, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study benchmarks five force fields for crystal structure energy calculations. UNI, CSD-OPCS16, and CLP force fields show the best accuracy for sublimation enthalpies, aiding force field selection for energetic studies.

Keywords:
BenchmarkForce fieldLattice energyPolymorph

More Related Videos

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies
07:31

Realistic Membrane Modeling Using Complex Lipid Mixtures in Simulation Studies

Published on: September 1, 2023

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
10:52

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics

Published on: April 12, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography and Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Chemical Physics

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of crystal lattice energies is crucial for understanding material properties.
  • General-purpose force fields are widely used but their performance varies across different chemical systems.
  • Evaluating force field performance against experimental data is essential for reliable computational studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the performance of five common force fields (CLP, UNI, CSD-OPCS16, DreidingII, Momany) in the CSD Software.
  • To assess their ability to reproduce experimental sublimation enthalpies and relative polymorph stabilities.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate force fields for energetic studies in crystallography.

Main Methods:

  • Benchmarking study using a dataset of 664 crystal structures from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD).
  • Evaluation of force field performance based on reproduction of experimental sublimation enthalpies.
  • Analysis of crystal structure optimization using a new force field-based optimizer.
  • Comparison with DFT data to assess the reproduction of relative polymorph stabilities.

Main Results:

  • UNI (11%), CSD-OPCS16 (13%), and CLP (13%) force fields demonstrated the smallest overall errors in reproducing sublimation enthalpies.
  • DreidingII (22%) and Momany (26%) force fields showed larger errors, which were reduced by structural optimization.
  • No single force field excelled across all chemical compound classes; accuracy is system-dependent.
  • General-purpose force fields are limited in predicting small energy differences between polymorphs.

Conclusions:

  • The UNI, CSD-OPCS16, and CLP force fields offer better accuracy for sublimation enthalpy calculations.
  • Force field performance is highly dependent on the specific chemistry of the system under investigation.
  • Careful selection of force fields is necessary for accurate energetic studies, especially for polymorph stability predictions.