Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction (PPI) Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
Do I belong?: implications of the ASLPI
John Pirone1, Octavian Robinson2, Erin Moriarty3
1Department of Education, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States.
The American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLPI) may disadvantage Deaf individuals. Reforms are needed to address racial bias and affirm diverse ASL use in evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Linguistic Anthropology
- Sociolinguistics
- Deaf Studies
Background:
- The American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLPI) is a standard assessment for ASL proficiency in academic and professional settings.
- ASL education predominantly features White, able-bodied educators, raising questions about the ASLPI's cultural and racial inclusivity.
- Existing research lacks critical examination of the ASLPI through the perspectives of Deaf individuals, particularly concerning language ideologies and colonial constructs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate Deaf participants' experiences with the ASLPI.
- To analyze how ASLPI's design, interaction, and evaluation are influenced by language ideologies, attitudes toward signed languages, and language boundaries as colonial constructs.
- To identify areas for ASLPI reform to better support diverse Deaf languaging practices.
Main Methods:
- The study employed thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with 10 Deaf participants.
- Participants shared their lived experiences and perceptions of the ASLPI process.
- Analysis focused on understanding the impact of racialized interactions, language scrutiny, and idealized ASL expectations.
Main Results:
- Deaf participants reported significant discomfort and anxiety stemming from racialized interactions with White interviewers.
- Participants experienced pressure to code-switch towards a standardized, idealized ASL, leading to feelings of linguistic scrutiny.
- A notable misalignment was observed between participants' perceived ASL competency and the outcomes of ASLPI evaluations.
Conclusions:
- The ASLPI's current structure and evaluation methods may perpetuate inequities for Deaf individuals, particularly those from diverse racial and cultural backgrounds.
- There is a critical need for reforms to enhance transparency and external review processes within the ASLPI.
- Affirming diverse Deaf languaging practices across race, culture, and disability is essential for equitable ASL assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Importance of Need for Affiliation
Implicit Personality Theories
In- and Out-Groups
Role-Based Identity
Social Identity
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
