Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
2025 American and European Guidelines on Neonatal Resuscitation: Concordance and Differences
Daniele Trevisanuto1, Viraraghavan V Ramaswamy2,3, Somashekhar Nimbalkar4
1Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, daniele.trevisanuto@unipd.it.
The 2025 neonatal resuscitation guidelines from AHA-AAP and ERC share a foundation but differ in scope and recommendations. Harmonizing these practices requires further research to address knowledge gaps.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal resuscitation
- Pediatric critical care
- Evidence-based medicine
Background:
- The American Heart Association-American Academy of Pediatrics (AHA-AAP) and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) released updated neonatal resuscitation guidelines in October 2025.
- Both guidelines are based on International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) evaluations but present differences in scope, structure, and clinical recommendations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 2025 AHA-AAP and ERC neonatal resuscitation guidelines.
- To identify and analyze areas of divergence between the two guideline documents.
- To reach a qualitative consensus on the clinical importance of identified differences.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of the 2025 AHA-AAP and ERC neonatal resuscitation guidelines.
- Focus on algorithm design, initial stabilization, ventilation strategies, and oxygen administration.
- Qualitative analysis of guideline differences and their clinical implications.
Main Results:
- Both guidelines advocate for a gentle, physiology-based approach to neonatal transition and family-centered care.
- Key differences exist in resuscitation algorithm complexity, ventilation management, and initial inspired oxygen concentration recommendations.
- Many identified differences stem from variations in guideline scope rather than conflicting evidence interpretation.
Conclusions:
- Despite a shared evidence base, the 2025 AHA-AAP and ERC guidelines exhibit notable divergences in specific recommendations.
- Several recommendations are based on limited data and expert consensus, highlighting areas for future research.
- Further high-quality research is crucial for harmonizing neonatal resuscitation practices globally.
More Related Videos
06:15Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
09:31Hemodynamic Precision in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit using Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography
Published on: January 27, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Standards of Care I
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques