Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Pediatric Quality Measures in Developmental Screening and Follow-Up
Genie Han1, Jennifer O Lambert2, Christina D Bethell2
1Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Insights
Quality measures for pediatric developmental screening and follow-up show good reliability, validity, and usability. However, feasibility remains a concern, requiring further research into standardization and stratification to improve early identification of developmental problems.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Timely identification and management of developmental problems are crucial for child development.
- Existing quality measures for developmental screening and follow-up require comprehensive evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and summarize existing quality measures for developmental screening and follow-up in children within the United States.
- To identify evidence regarding the reliability, validity, usability, and feasibility of these measures.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a systematic search of multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsychINFO) from 2009 to December 2024.
- Included systematic reviews, primary studies, and expert-recommended gray literature.
- Extracted data on measure definitions, study characteristics, implementation barriers, and research gaps by two independent reviewers.
Main Results:
- Identified 67 screening and 61 follow-up measures, primarily for early childhood in clinical settings.
- Found substantial evidence for reliability, validity, and usability across many measures, but mixed evidence for feasibility.
- Observed limited reporting on measure use variations and minimal evidence on reducing health disparities; common barriers included EHR integration and resource limitations.
Conclusions:
- While many pediatric developmental screening and follow-up measures demonstrate strong psychometric properties, their practical feasibility requires attention.
- Future research should prioritize enhancing feasibility, standardizing measures, and stratifying data to address diverse populations.
- Focusing on these areas can improve the effectiveness of early developmental problem identification and management.
Context:
Timely identification and management of developmental problems are essential for children.
Objective:
To summarize quality measures for developmental screening and follow-up among children in the United States.
Data Sources:
PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PsychINFO from 2009 to December 7, 2024. Gray literature sources recommended by experts.
Study Selection:
Systematic reviews, primary studies, and gray literature sources.
Data Extraction:
Two reviewers extracted information on measure definitions, study characteristics, barriers, and research gaps.
Results:
We included 11 systematic reviews, 36 studies, and 11 gray literature sources and identified 67 developmental screening measures and 61 follow-up measures. Measures focused on early childhood in clinic settings. We found evidence for reliability, validity, and usability in 29, 25, and 30 screening measures, respectively, and 34, 39, and 36 follow-up measures, respectively, with evidence both for and against feasibility of measures. Eighteen studies showed improvement in measures with use of specific tools or implementation practices for developmental screening and follow-up. Differences in use of measures by state, population, institution, or clinician type were infrequently described. Barriers to measure implementation related to electronic health record data extraction, resource limitations, and burden of data collection and reporting. We found little evidence on reduced disparities associated with measure implementation.
Limitations:
We excluded information from other countries, from before 2009, or about measures for behavioral, social, or emotional screening.
Conclusion:
Many pediatric developmental screening and follow-up measures have evidence of reliability, validity, and usability, but feasibility is a concern. Future research should focus on feasibility, standardization, and stratification.
Related Concept Videos
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Preventive Healthcare Services
