Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
What is Evolutionary History?02:35

What is Evolutionary History?

Scientists record evolutionary history by analyzing fossil, morphological, and genetic data. The fossil record documents the history of life on Earth and provides evidence for evolution. However, both fossil and living organisms offer evidence that outlines Earth’s evolutionary history.
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Evolution of New Traits in Microbes01:24

Evolution of New Traits in Microbes

Microorganisms evolve rapidly due to their large population sizes and short generation times, often exhibiting measurable changes within days under laboratory conditions. Natural selection acts on standing genetic variation, enabling the retention and amplification of beneficial traits that confer fitness advantages in changing environments.Adaptive Pigment Regulation in RhodobacterIn Rhodobacter, a genus of purple non-sulfur bacteria, light-harvesting pigments such as bacteriochlorophyll and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

European Cancer Prevention Organization on cancer screening: an expert panel position paper.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2026
Same author

EBCC-15 manifesto: Removing age-related barriers to improve equity in breast cancer care.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same author

Histological subtype and receptor characteristics of cancers detected or missed by digital mammography and tomosynthesis: Results from MAITA randomized trials.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence as medical device in radiology in 2025: the regulatory scenario in the EU, USA, and China.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Assessing breast MRI image quality: the bMRI-QUAL scoring system.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Italian guidelines for the use of digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening programmes: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT of the European guidelines.

La Radiologia medica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Peer review: historical evolution and reviewers' learning.

Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez1,2, Francesco Sardanelli3

  • 1Department of Radiology, Auckland Hospital (Te Whatu Ora), Auckland, New Zealand. pilar.aparisi@tewhatuora.govt.nz.

Insights Into Imaging
|May 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Peer review, a cornerstone of scientific integrity, has evolved historically to ensure robust research. This process not only validates findings but also serves as a vital educational tool for reviewers, enhancing scientific and clinical knowledge.

Keywords:
KnowledgeMethodology (research)Peer reviewRadiologyScience

More Related Videos

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

A Practical Guide to Phage- and Robotics-Assisted Near-Continuous Evolution
05:08

A Practical Guide to Phage- and Robotics-Assisted Near-Continuous Evolution

Published on: January 12, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

A Practical Guide to Phage- and Robotics-Assisted Near-Continuous Evolution
05:08

A Practical Guide to Phage- and Robotics-Assisted Near-Continuous Evolution

Published on: January 12, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Scientific communication and research integrity.
  • The historical and epistemological foundations of scientific evaluation.

Background:

  • Peer review evolved from informal judgments in early scientific societies to a structured safeguard.
  • Its roots trace back to ancient Greek philosophy and Cartesian methods, emphasizing critical examination.
  • The process began formally in Europe in 1665 with early scientific journals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the historical evolution and epistemological underpinnings of peer review.
  • To highlight the role of peer review as an educational tool, particularly in specialized fields like radiology.
  • To underscore its function in refining scientific reasoning and knowledge transfer.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of scientific communication practices.
  • Examination of philosophical traditions influencing critical assessment.
  • Case illustration of peer review's function in contemporary radiology.

Main Results:

  • Peer review has transformed from informal critiques to a structured scientific process.
  • It compels authors to rigorously justify claims and assumptions.
  • In fields like radiology, it enhances detection of bias and methodological flaws, distinguishing research types.

Conclusions:

  • Peer review is a dynamic process that shapes both scientific output and the development of scientists.
  • Reviewing manuscripts significantly improves reviewers' scientific and clinical knowledge, applicable to daily practice.
  • Despite challenges like reviewer fatigue, it remains essential for scientific progress and learning.