Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
Published on: July 12, 2022
Diagnostic performance of a novel wireless direct-conversion intraoral sensor versus complementary metal-oxide
Matheus Barros-Costa1, Gustavo Machado Santaella2, Gabriela Gavilan Hadid2
1Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo 13414-903, Brazil.
Objectives:
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a new wireless direct-conversion digital intraoral sensor to current indirect-conversion complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) and photostimulable storage phosphor (PSP) sensors for detecting proximal caries.
Methods:
The sample in this ex vivo study were 28 human premolars with 21 micro-CT verified non-cavitated proximal dental carious lesions. Images were obtained using 3 digital intraoral systems: a wireless direct-conversion sensor, a wired indirect-conversion CMOS sensor, and a PSP sensor. A custom phantom was constructed providing a limited dental arch segment comprising a molar, first premolar, and canine. The premolar was substituted and the phantom imaged using each intraoral system with (filtered) and without (raw) the application of a manufacturer-recommended enhancements, providing 168 images. Eight oral radiologists assessed the images using a 5-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) and compared across modalities using 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey's test at an a priori level of significance of 0.05.
Results:
The AUC ranged from 0.58 to 0.73 (sensitivity range: 0.21-0.68, specificity range: 0.69-0.92). The wireless direct-conversion sensor (0.72 ± 0.06) showed diagnostic performance comparable to CMOS (0.72 ± 0.06) and superior to PSP (0.58 ± 0.07) for raw images (P < .001). The direct-conversion sensor without image enhancement (0.68 ± 0.18) demonstrated the highest sensitivity, whereas the PSP without image enhancement (0.21 ± 0.09) had the lowest sensitivity. Application of image enhancement improved PSP performance (0.48 ± 0.16), approximating that of the other systems.
Conclusions:
Based on this ex vivo study, the wireless direct-conversion and CMOS sensors demonstrated similar diagnostic performance, superior to PSP in unfiltered conditions. These findings should be interpreted in light of the ex vivo design and modest sample size.
