Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

05:49
Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024
Accuracy of Orthodontic Malocclusion Detection Using Multiple AI Models: A Comparative Study
Hillda Herawati1, Joko Kusnoto2, Indrayadi Gunardi3
1Doctoral Program in Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Healthcare Informatics Research
|May 21, 2026
Summary
This study found that current artificial intelligence (AI) models have limited accuracy in detecting orthodontic malocclusions from intraoral photos, with performance varying by feature. Task-specific AI models are needed for better orthodontic decision support.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Accurate detection of orthodontic malocclusions is crucial for effective treatment planning.
- The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in analyzing medical images, including intraoral photographs, is an emerging field.
- Evaluating the diagnostic capabilities of general-purpose AI models in orthodontics is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of leading AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot) in identifying orthodontic malocclusion features.
- To assess the agreement between AI model assessments and expert orthodontist evaluations.
- To determine the performance of AI in detecting specific malocclusion parameters from standardized intraoral photographs.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed five standardized intraoral views from 50 children (aged 9-12).
- Eight malocclusion parameters were assessed: anterior crowding, diastema, overjet, overbite, molar/canine relationships, crossbite, and arch symmetry.
- Diagnostic accuracy was measured using Cohen's kappa and AUC, comparing AI models against an orthodontist's diagnosis.
Main Results:
- AI models showed poor to moderate agreement (Cohen's κ: -0.15 to 0.63) with orthodontist assessments.
- Easily visible features like crowding and diastema had higher accuracy (AUC: 0.56-0.85).
- Complex features requiring spatial analysis (overbite, crossbite, arch symmetry) had low agreement and near-random performance (AUC: 0.41-0.70).
Conclusions:
- Current multimodal AI models have limited, feature-dependent accuracy for orthodontic malocclusion detection.
- General-purpose AI systems are not yet sufficient for reliable orthodontic decision support.
- Development of specialized AI models trained on clinically annotated orthodontic datasets is necessary.
