Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).
Published on: March 6, 2018
Life Cycle Assessment of HoLEP: Quantifying Environmental Impact and Opportunities for Sustainable Urologic Surgery
Clément Klein1, Véronique Humbert2, Mathieu Meune3
1Urology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, France.
Background:
The healthcare sector faces growing pressure to reduce its environmental impact. In urology, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is a standard treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), but its procedure-related environmental impact remains unknown.
Objective:
We aimed to quantify HoLEP's life cycle environmental impacts, identify major environmental hotspots, and evaluate the impact of a fluid management system developed according to sustainable-by-design principles.
Design Setting And Participants:
We conducted a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of 20 consecutive HoLEP procedures, following ISO 14040/44 standards and the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology. ISO 14040/44 allowed us to structure the study while the 16 PEF indicators ensure comparability with other European medical devices. All perioperative phases (pre-, intra-, and post-operative) were included, encompassing medical devices, consumables, energy use, and waste streams.
Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis:
Environmental impacts were modeled using SimaPro v9.6 with the Ecoinvent database. Primary outcomes were the PEF score and the carbon footprint (CF). Environmental performance was compared between the 10-L fluid collection canisters and the SUPER S.HO.W. fluid management system. Statistical analyses used non-parametric tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results And Limitations:
The median PEF score per HoLEP procedure was 5.9 points (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.7-6.1), with a CF of 106 kg CO2-eq (IQR: 102-118). The intra-operative HoLEP phase accounted for 49% of the overall environmental impact. Fluid collection canisters were the main contributors among medical devices (48%). Use of the SUPER S.HO.W. system reduced the PEF score by 21% and the CF by 13%. As a single-center study with a limited sample size, generalizability may be restricted.
Conclusions:
HoLEP generates quantifiable life cycle environmental impacts. Optimizing surgical workflows and implementing innovative solutions-such as the closed-circuit SUPER S.HO.W. system-significantly reduce the environmental impact of endourological procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management

