How Effective Are Credible Sources in Changing Behavior? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Jack Hamer1, Tracy Epton1, Danielle Hamer2
1University of Manchester, UK.
None:
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the unique effects of credible sources on performed behavior, rather than behavioral antecedents (i.e., attitudes), and contexts where it is most effective. Six databases were searched to June 2024, yielding 40 effect sizes (N = 7,995, 58.42% females, mean age of 17.75 years old, with mostly White ethnicity 75.81%) from 34 papers. A random effects model indicated a small positive effect, d = 0.14 (95% CI [0.04, 0.23]). Moderator analyses showed significant positive effects when the credible source had a medical professional qualification, communicated with participants in-person, the intervention was verbal or combined verbal and written messages, when behavior occurred once, and immediately followed the intervention. Because of the small effect, the costs associated with generating credible sources should be balanced against their effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Persuasion Strategies
Social Proof
Routes of Persuasion
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
