Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Diagnostic Accuracy of an Integrated Multimodality Imaging Approach in Patients With Cardiac Masses
Francesco Angeli1, Matteo Armillotta1, Alberto Foà2
1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiovascular Division, Morgagni-Pierantoni University Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Background:
Multimodality imaging plays a central role in the evaluation of cardiac masses (CMs), yet the comparative performance of integrated imaging strategies including cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiac computed tomography (CCT), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) remains incompletely defined.
Objectives:
This study sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric scores derived from echocardiography, CMR, CCT, and 18F-FDG PET, individually and in combination, for identifying malignant CMs using histology as the reference standard.
Methods:
In this prospective study, patients with suspected CMs underwent echocardiography, CCT, CMR, and 18F-FDG PET within 2 months of first medical contact. Final diagnosis was established by histology or radiological resolution after anticoagulation therapy for thrombi. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic curves, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared with the DeLong test, applying Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. CART (Classification And Regression Tree) analysis assessed the incremental value of PET following CMR or CCT.
Results:
Among 142 patients, 54% had malignant CMs. Echocardiography showed the lowest diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.77). CMR demonstrated the highest standalone performance (AUC: 0.94), outperforming CCT and 18F-FDG PET (both AUCs: 0.85). The combination of CMR and 18F-FDG PET was associated with high diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.97; positive predictive value 95.1%; negative predictive value 100%), whereas CCT combined with 18F-FDG PET achieved an AUC of 0.92. The addition of PET after CMR or CCT was associated with improved diagnostic classification in selected cases, as supported by CART analysis.
Conclusions:
CMR provides the highest standalone accuracy for malignancy detection. In inconclusive cases, adding 18F-FDG PET further improves diagnostic performance, while CCT combined with 18F-FDG PET represents a reliable alternative.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...

