From Discoverable to Fit-For-Purpose: Measuring the Impact of Health and Oncology-Specific Metadata Within the Context of the EHDS
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Kailesh Bansi1, Jurrian van der Werf1, Matthijs Sloepa2
1Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Creating high-quality cancer research data is resource-intensive, and maximizing its reuse requires both interoperability and interpretability. Within the context of the emerging European Health Data Space (EHDS), standardized metadata based on Health DCAT-AP offers a foundation for discoverability, but its effectiveness in enabling researchers to assess whether data are fit-for-purpose remains largely untested. This study evaluated the practical usability of Health DCAT-AP for oncology research by analyzing nine real data requests submitted to the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Requests were categorized as uncomplicated, complex, or rejected, reflecting different levels of metadata adequacy and interpretability. Results show that Health DCAT-AP is sufficient for uncomplicated requests using standard classifications (e.g., ICD-O-3), but less effective for complex studies involving rare cancers, long-term follow-up, or multi-source linkages. Dialogue with data holders remains essential. We identify areas where oncology-specific metadata extensions could improve clarity: particularly in cohort definition, linkage feasibility, and follow-up completeness, and propose alignment with EU-wide metadata governance to ensure sustainable, interoperable, and FAIR oncology data reuse across member states.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Discovery: Overview
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Purpose of Health Records II
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors

