Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022
What it Takes to Implement Population-Based Genomic Screening: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Implementation
Caitlin G Allen1, Deborah Cragun2, Miranda Hallquist3
1Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
Implementing population-based genomic screening (PGS) requires addressing phase-specific challenges. Early stages need financing and prioritization, while later stages benefit from partnerships and sustained engagement for successful hereditary condition risk identification.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Healthcare Implementation Science
- Public Health
Background:
- Population-based genomic screening (PGS) offers potential for identifying individuals at high risk for hereditary conditions.
- Lack of implementation guidance hinders the scalability and impact of PGS programs.
- This study explored facilitators and barriers to PGS implementation across different healthcare settings and implementation phases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify facilitators and barriers to population-based genomic screening (PGS) implementation.
- To understand how these factors vary across different phases of PGS adoption (pre-adoption, implementing, sustaining).
- To inform the development of effective implementation strategies for PGS programs.
Main Methods:
- Conducted qualitative interviews with 34 implementation team members across 10 PGS sites.
- Sites were categorized into pre-adoption, implementing, and sustaining phases.
- Utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0 for coding and analysis, visualized with a data matrix heat map.
Main Results:
- Pre-adoption sites faced barriers in financing, institutional priority, workflow complexity, and genomic knowledge.
- Implementing sites struggled with workflow/infrastructure development and clinical capacity but were aided by partnerships and leadership.
- Sustaining sites contended with persistent knowledge gaps and resource strain but benefited from strong partnerships and leadership engagement.
Conclusions:
- PGS implementation involves phase-specific challenges and evolving facilitators.
- Financing and institutional prioritization are key for initial adoption, while partnerships and relationships are crucial for sustained implementation.
- Adaptive, phase-specific strategies are necessary to overcome barriers like policy constraints and knowledge gaps, emphasizing dynamic implementation approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: Overview
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Genomics
