Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Telerehabilitation in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: a systematic review.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Prehospital whole blood after SWiFT and TOWAR: not superior, not settled.

Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue·2026
Same author

Multi-method validation of the new computerized test of fluid intelligence MatriKS.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Design and Implementation of an Automated Interpretation Algorithm for Lupus Anticoagulant Functional Testing.

International journal of laboratory hematology·2026
Same author

Prolonged Visual Entrainment Induces Long-Lasting Alpha-Band Modulations.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Sensor-Based Assessment of Morning Prospective Memory in Narcolepsy Type 1: Evidence from Children and Adult Cohorts.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Adverse and positive childhood experiences in relation to adolescent mental health: sequential indirect associations.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Personality profiles and usage experience are associated with trust and dependence on generative AI: a latent profile analysis.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Promoting replicability: empowering method and applied researchers in driving reliable results.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The mediating roles of the challenge appraisal in the relationship between the coach-athlete relationship and adolescent athletes' burnout.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Unpacking GenAI-enabled deep learning engagement: role perceptions, human-GenAI synergy strategies, and underlying mechanisms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Violence exposure and cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of moral disengagement.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Error patterns on a computerized version of Raven's progressive matrices in specific learning disorders.

Matilde Spinoso1, Mariagrazia Benassi1, Alice Riccardi1

  • 1Department of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", Cesena Campus, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy.

Frontiers in Psychology
|May 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Analyzing error patterns in Fluid Intelligence (FI) for Specific Learning Disorders (SLDs) reveals distinct cognitive profiles. Qualitative analysis offers deeper insights into SLD subtypes than quantitative scores alone.

Keywords:
Raven’s matricescomputerized assessmenterror analysiserror patternsfluid abilitiesfluid intelligencefluid reasoningspecific learning disorder

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Neurodevelopmental disorders
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Educational psychology

Background:

  • Specific Learning Disorders (SLDs) are neurodevelopmental conditions with persistent difficulties in reading, writing, or math, despite average intelligence.
  • Previous research on Fluid Intelligence (FI) in SLDs focused on quantitative measures, often overlooking qualitative aspects like error patterns.
  • Understanding individual cognitive profiles in SLDs is crucial for targeted interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate Fluid Intelligence (FI) in children and adolescents with SLDs using a novel computerized assessment.
  • To explore the utility of qualitative error analysis in differentiating SLD subtypes and developmental stages.
  • To determine if error patterns in FI can reveal specific processing vulnerabilities in SLDs.

Main Methods:

  • A sample of 160 participants (88 with SLDs, 72 typically developing), aged 7-19, completed the MatriKS computerized assessment of FI.
  • Participants with SLDs were subtyped based on academic impairment (reading/writing vs. mathematics).
  • Convergent validity of MatriKS was assessed, and quantitative and qualitative error analyses were performed.

Main Results:

  • MatriKS demonstrated good convergent validity with traditional Raven's Progressive Matrices.
  • Significant group differences in overall FI accuracy were found, with the mathematics subgroup showing the greatest difficulties.
  • Qualitative error analysis revealed distinct patterns across SLD subtypes and age groups, differentiating diagnostic groups effectively.

Conclusions:

  • While global FI scores may appear average in individuals with SLDs, qualitative error analysis uncovers specific reasoning inefficiencies.
  • Error pattern analysis can differentiate SLD subtypes and developmental stages, providing a more nuanced understanding of cognitive profiles.
  • Integrating qualitative error analysis into assessments can enhance understanding of underlying processing vulnerabilities in SLDs, informing tailored interventions.