Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

Optimal Arousal Theory

Optimal Arousal Theory

The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mechanisms of Working Memory Prioritization: Retro-Cues vs. Saccadic Preparation.

Psychophysiology·2026

Same author

When the meaningless make sense: Wordlikeness and affective norms for 4,800 pseudowords and 1,200 Spanish words.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

New approaches to subliminal perception: exploring the unconscious perception of masked primes with Bayesian regression models and General Recognition Theory (GRT).

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same author

Relationships Between Subjective Iconicity Ratings and Phonological Variables in English and Spanish.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025

Same author

New methods, old questions: advancing the study of unconscious perception.

Frontiers in psychology·2025

Same author

You Can Stand Under My Umbrella: Cognitive Load in Second-Language Reading.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Published on: August 29, 2018

Naturalistic actions modulate Working Memory prioritization in immersive virtual reality.

Estela Caballero-Picazo¹, Francisco Rocabado², José Antonio Hinojosa^1,3

¹Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Procesos Cognitivos y Logopedia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Scientific Reports

|May 25, 2026

Summary

Naturalistic actions enhance working memory prioritization compared to simple button presses, especially for relevant information. This highlights the link between action and cognition in dynamic environments.

Keywords:

Action–perception coupling Pre-cueing Retro-cueing Virtual reality Working Memory Working Memory prioritization

More Related Videos

Behavioral Training Procedures for Head-fixed Virtual Reality in Mice

Behavioral Training Procedures for Head-fixed Virtual Reality in Mice

Published on: September 6, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Published on: August 29, 2018

Behavioral Training Procedures for Head-fixed Virtual Reality in Mice

Behavioral Training Procedures for Head-fixed Virtual Reality in Mice

Published on: September 6, 2024

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Human cognition is action-oriented, linking perception and action via Working Memory (WM).
Traditional lab studies often simplify response demands, limiting understanding of real-world perception-action coupling.
Prior research suggests action planning influences WM content maintenance.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how the nature of actions modulates sensory representation prioritization in WM.
To explore the impact of naturalistic actions versus simple responses on WM performance.
To assess the utility of virtual reality for studying WM in ecologically relevant contexts.

Main Methods:

A virtual reality task was employed to simulate dynamic environments.
Participants performed either a button press or a naturalistic object movement as a response.
Spatial cues indicated task-relevant items, with pre-cued and retro-cued conditions.
Generalized linear mixed-effects models analyzed accuracy data.

Main Results:

Naturalistic actions led to significantly higher accuracy compared to button presses.
This accuracy advantage was specifically observed for validly cued items.
The findings indicate that action context influences WM prioritization benefits.

Conclusions:

The nature of actions dynamically modulates the prioritization of sensory information within Working Memory.
Immersive virtual reality offers a powerful platform for ecologically grounded WM research.
Understanding perception-action coupling in WM is crucial for explaining flexible cognitive function.