Geometric Accuracy of 3D-Printed Composite Dental Restorations Compared with the Original STL Design

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables customized, efficient restorative workflows, though the accuracy of 3D-printed restorations may be compromised by polymerization, sintering shrinkage, and post-processing. This study evaluated the geometric accuracy of 3D-printed partial restorations compared with the computer-aided design (CAD) reference. The null hypothesis stated that no significant differences would be found between Varseo Smile Crown^plus (by BEGO, Italy) and IRIXMax (by DWS System, Italy) materials, which are printed and cured with different technologies. A model was prepared for an overlay and designed with a 1.5 mm uniform thickness. Restorations were produced in two groups with two different printing processes: DLP (digital light processing)-printed Varseo Smile Crown^plus and SLA (stereolithography)-printed IRIXMax. Six samples per group were printed at 90° orientation and scanned. Meshes were aligned to the master geometry via pre-alignment and ICP (Iterative Closest Point) registration. Deviations were quantified in CloudCompare using mean, standard deviation (SD), and 90th percentile values. IRIXMax showed the lowest deviations from the ideal geometry, while Varseo Smile Crown^plus exhibited greater variability. Pairwise comparisons found IRIXMax significantly more accurate than Varseo Smile Crown^plus. Color maps confirmed material-specific deviation patterns. IRIXMax provided the highest geometric accuracy. Material-specific calibration is essential for reliable 3D-printed definitive restorations.