Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maximal fat oxidation training improves mental health in children with obesity: a 2-month randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Early Versus Late Extubation After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2026
Same author

Does the Development of Delirium Predict Lower Survival and Increased Morbidity After Cardiac Surgery? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

La Clinica terapeutica·2026
Same author

Limb-belt resisted sprint training improves physical fitness and ball-throw velocity in pubertal handball players.

Biology of sport·2024
Same author

Efficient lung cancer detection using computational intelligence and ensemble learning.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Effects of Different Doses of Multienzyme Supplementation on Growth Performance, Duodenal pH and Morphology, and Carcass Traits in Broilers Fed Diets with an Increasing Reduction in Energy.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2023
Same journal

Integrated multi-assessment and structural performance index framework for stacking-sequence optimisation of natural fibre reinforced laminates.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

SuperiorGAT: graph attention networks for sparse LiDAR point cloud reconstruction in autonomous systems.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

The effect of stretching the pectoralis major, sternocleidomastoid, and iliopsoas muscles on 800 m swimming performance in master swimmers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

ISNR-PQC: isometry noise resilience post quantum cryptography primitive.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Identification of high-yielding and stable genotypes of barley in the cold climate of Iran using AMMI and GGE biplot models.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Bayesian negative binomial modelling of spatial and temporal patterns of road traffic deaths in Ghana.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Vision-Language Models for automated quality control: a benchmarking framework and comprehensive study.

Mohamed Abdelkader1

  • 1Robotics & Internet of Things Lab, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. mabdelkader@psu.edu.sa.

Scientific Reports
|May 26, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer semantic quality assessment for object detection but show varied performance across domains. Benchmarking reveals LLaVA-13B leads, yet current VLMs are best for supervised deployment, not full autonomy.

Keywords:
AI-based sensingAutonomous systemsBenchmarkingIntelligent sensingMulti-modal AIQuality controlReal-time object detectionVision-Language Models

More Related Videos

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Automated object detection systems need quality assessment for real-world deployment.
  • Traditional methods lack semantic understanding for effective model adaptation.
  • Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer potential for semantic-level quality control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively benchmark Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for semantic quality assessment of object detection.
  • To evaluate VLM performance across diverse domains including medical imaging, aerial surveillance, and industrial inspection.
  • To provide evidence-based guidelines for VLM deployment in computer vision systems.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic evaluation of nine state-of-the-art VLMs on five diverse object detection datasets.
  • Rigorous statistical analysis using multi-class classification, accuracy metrics, coefficient of variation, and Kruskal-Wallis testing.
  • Development of operational tiers based on deployment criticality and performance metrics.

Main Results:

  • Substantial performance heterogeneity observed across VLMs and domains (accuracy 8.5%-82.8%).
  • LLaVA-13B achieved the highest overall accuracy (48.6%), while medical domains presented the greatest challenge.
  • Significant inter-model performance differences confirmed across all domains (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Current VLMs demonstrate suitability for supervised deployment in quality control, not fully autonomous operation.
  • Established operational tiers guide VLM implementation based on domain criticality.
  • The benchmark provides crucial insights and open-source tools for VLM-based quality assessment in production computer vision.