Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026
![Automated Preparation of [68Ga]Ga-3BP-3940 on a Synthesis Module for PET Imaging of the Tumor Microenvironment](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F68356.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Automated Preparation of [68Ga]Ga-3BP-3940 on a Synthesis Module for PET Imaging of the Tumor Microenvironment
Published on: April 25, 2025
The FAP-FDG Integration Score (FFIS): Development and prognostic validation of a dual-tracer PET phenotype for solid
Ya Liu1,2,3, Ting Zhang4, Jingwei Deng1,2,3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No 25 TaiPing St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, 646000, PR China.
Purpose:
To develop a FAP-FDG integrated score (FFIS) based on [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, and evaluate its prognostic value for risk stratification compared to conventional single-parameter imaging.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 193 patients with solid tumors who underwent both [18F]F-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT scans. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The FFIS score was constructed by analyzing the uptake intensity and patterns of both radiotracers. Survival analysis employed the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic predictive value of FFIS, FDG-SUVmax, and FAP-SUVmax was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and compared with other clinical variables. Finally, subgroup analysis and interaction tests explored the prognostic consistency of FFIS, FDG-SUVmax, and FAP-SUVmax across different subgroups.
Results:
FFIS emerged as an independent predictor of OS in both univariate (HR = 1.79, P < 0.001) and multivariate (HR = 1.75, P < 0.001) analyses. A higher FFIS reliably predicted worse survival: no deaths occurred among patients of score 1, whereas the median OS was 36, 13, and 8 months for scores 2, 3, and 4, respectively (Log-Rank P < 0.0001). This prognostic stratification remained consistent nearly all clinical subgroups (P-interaction > 0.05). In contrast, FDG-SUVmax showed no independent prognostic value, and FAP-SUVmax was predictive only in univariate analysis (HR = 1.04, P = 0.03).
Conclusion:
By integrating metabolic and stromal information, the FFIS may offer preliminary prognostic value across solid tumors.

