Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
Published on: April 16, 2014
Mechanisms of Visuomotor Interception
Inmaculada Márquez1,2,3, Mario Treviño1
1Laboratorio de Plasticidad Cortical y Aprendizaje Perceptual, Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Francisco de Quevedo 180, Arcos Vallarta, Guadalajara 44130, Jalisco, Mexico.
Background/Objectives:
Visuomotor interception requires aligning action with the future state of moving targets under sensory and motor delays. This constraint provides a tractable framework to examine how predictive and feedback-driven processes interact. This narrative review evaluates theoretical and empirical accounts of interception, with emphasis on how prediction and online control are integrated across behavioral and neural levels.
Methods:
We conducted a narrative synthesis of behavioral, eye-tracking, computational, and neurophysiological studies on visuomotor interception. Literature was identified through searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using search terms including "visuomotor interception," "predictive motor control," "eye-hand coordination," "time-to-contact," "sensorimotor delay," and related combinations. Studies published between 1986 and 2026 were considered, with emphasis on peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical work. Preprints were included only when directly relevant and are identified as such. The review compares internal model, ecological, and hybrid frameworks, and organizes evidence around spatial ("where") and temporal ("when") components of control.
Results:
Across paradigms, interception behavior is not well accounted for by purely predictive or reactive mechanisms. Instead, trajectories reflect a continuous interaction between anticipatory guidance and online correction. Spatial and temporal components show partial dissociation across tasks and manipulations. Available evidence supports the involvement of distributed circuits, including parietal, frontal, cerebellar, and subcortical systems, while indicating that eye movements play an active role in both information sampling and motor planning.
Conclusions:
Interception is best understood as the product of interacting biological, environmental, and learned constraints. Similar behavioral signatures can arise from distinct mechanisms, arguing against a unitary account. Progress requires integrating behavioral analyses with model-based and neural approaches to dissociate underlying computations.
Related Concept Videos
Indirect Motor Pathways
The vestibulospinal tract originates in the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem. The vestibular system detects changes in...
Major Somatic Sensory Pathways
Vision
Visual System
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
Mechanism of Ciliary Motion
The cilia are made up of microtubules in a 9+2 arrangement, with nine microtubule doublet ring bundles, surrounding a pair of central singlet microtubule bundles. The doublet microtubule bundles are...
Mechanism of Ciliary Motion
The cilia are made up of microtubules in a 9+2 arrangement, with nine microtubule doublet ring bundles, surrounding a pair of central singlet microtubule bundles. The doublet microtubule bundles are...

