Limited Incremental Diagnostic Value of Perilesional and Systematic Biopsies in PI-RADS 4-5 Lesions: A Retrospective

Emiliano Scarrone1, Vittorio Canale1, Luca Antonelli2,3

  • 1Department of Urology, ASL AT Cardinal Massaia Hospital, 14100 Asti, Italy.

Cancers
|May 27, 2026
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Targeted biopsy (TBx) alone is sufficient for most high-grade PI-RADS 4-5 prostate lesions. However, systematic (SBx) and perilesional biopsies (PBx) may help avoid underdiagnosis in PI-RADS 3 cases.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is crucial for detecting prostate cancer.
  • PI-RADS scoring stratifies lesion risk, guiding biopsy decisions.
  • The diagnostic yield of different biopsy techniques requires further evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the added diagnostic value of systematic biopsies (SBx) and perilesional biopsies (PBx) compared to targeted biopsy (TBx).
  • To evaluate these techniques in patients with PI-RADS 3-5 lesions detected by mpMRI.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 208 men with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions undergoing mpMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy.
  • Standardized protocol included TBx, PBx (within 10 mm of index lesion), and SBx.
  • Detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; ISUP ≥ 2) and ISUP grade upgrading were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • TBx detection rates for csPCa increased with PI-RADS score (39% for 3, 50% for 4, 60% for 5).
  • PBx and SBx showed higher detection rates but rarely led to clinically meaningful ISUP grade upgrading over TBx.
  • ISUP grade upgrading occurred in only 7.3% of PBx and 1.8% of SBx cases in PI-RADS 5 lesions.

Conclusions:

  • For PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, TBx alone detects most csPCa, suggesting biopsy de-escalation is feasible.
  • Omitting SBx and/or PBx in PI-RADS 3 cases may risk underdiagnosis of higher-grade tumors.
  • These findings impact biopsy strategies to optimize cancer detection and minimize morbidity.

Related Concept Videos