Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
Published on: August 16, 2024
Is a Constricted Imaginal Capacity a Component of the Alexithymia Construct? A Factor Analytic Exploration in a
R Michael Bagby1,2, Paweł Larionow3, Cheyenne S McIntyre4
1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.
None:
Background/Objectives: Alexithymia is a potential transdiagnostic risk factor for psychiatric and medical disorders involving affect dysregulation. But there is debate over whether a constricted imaginal capacity constitutes a core component of the construct or is a separable correlate. Our aim was to further explore this controversy as any revision to the construct has implications for clinical formulation, neurobiological models of associated default mode network dysfunction, and the coherence of the original psychiatric conceptualization. Methods: To replicate and extend previous factor analytic work, we conducted a two-stage exploratory factor analysis in a community sample that included individuals with a psychiatric history (N = 681). Using most of the subscale indicators employed in two prior factor analytic studies, we used a two-stage procedure: Stage 1 re-employed the general design of those studies. Stage 2 re-specified the analytic space by removing emotional reactivity and fantasizing-for-regulation variables that form their own separable latent dimensions. Results: Stage 1 yielded a conceptual replication of structural separation between alexithymia and imaginal processes. Stage 2 revealed meaningful cross-loadings obscured in the full set, most notably positive constructive daydreaming loading negatively on an externally oriented thinking factor, providing empirical support for the pensée opératoire construct. Additional cross-loadings linked dysphoric daydreaming and poor attentional control with negative emotion appraisal. Conclusions: The structural independence of alexithymia and imaginal processes is partly contingent on indicator set composition. Construct revision should be grounded not on two factor analytic studies using abbreviated self-report measures, but in convergent evidence across methods, including neuroimaging, electroencephalography, structured interview, performance-based assessment, and clinical observation.
More Related Videos
11:30Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotional Autobiographical Recollection
Published on: August 26, 2011
09:14Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: March 14, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Introspection
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Understanding Self-Concept
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Language and Cognition
Implicit Personality Theories