Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

05:11
Treatment of Middle-segment Pancreatic Benign Tumor Using Laparoscopic Central Pancreatectomy with End-to-end Pancreatic Duct Reconstruction
Published on: January 2, 2026
Interdisciplinary Step-Up Strategy for Infected Pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis: Sinus Tract Endoscopic Necrosectomy
Valerie Kremo1, Julia Mühlhäusser1,2, Hanna Plazer1
1Department of General Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|May 27, 2026
Summary
Sinus tract endoscopy guided necrosectomy (STEN) and laparoscopic-assisted necrosectomy (LAPN) show comparable outcomes for infected walled-off necrosis (WON) management. Both minimally invasive techniques are effective within a step-up approach, though further research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Innovation
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Acute infected necrotizing pancreatitis presents significant morbidity and mortality.
- The step-up approach, combining percutaneous drainage with necrosectomy, improves outcomes over open surgery.
- Laparoscopic-assisted necrosectomy (LAPN) is used for infected walled-off necrosis (WON) post-drainage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of sinus tract endoscopy guided necrosectomy (STEN) compared to LAPN.
- To assess STEN as a less invasive alternative for managing infected WON within a step-up approach.
- To compare clinical outcomes and complication rates between STEN and LAPN.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 17 patients with infected WON managed via a step-up approach (2019-2025).
- Patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous drainage followed by either STEN (n=9) or LAPN (n=8).
- Primary endpoint: composite of major complications and 6-month mortality; secondary endpoints: overall complications, reinterventions, and hospital stay.
Main Results:
- Six of nine (66.7%) STEN patients met the primary endpoint (major complications, no mortality).
- Four of eight (50.0%) LAPN patients met the primary endpoint (3 major complications, 1 death).
- Both STEN and LAPN demonstrated comparable outcomes in managing infected WON.
Conclusions:
- Both STEN and LAPN are effective in treating infected WON within the step-up approach.
- STEN offers a potentially less invasive option with comparable efficacy to LAPN.
- Findings are exploratory due to small sample size; larger studies are warranted to confirm STEN's role.