Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Diagnostic Value of Native T1 and T2 Mapping in Differentiating Clinically Suspected Amyloidosis and Hypertrophic
Sena Unal1, Caglar Uzun1, Sena Bozer Uludag2
1Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Hacettepe Mahallesi A. Adnan Saygun Cad. No: 35, 06230 Altındağ, Ankara, Türkiye.
Insights
Non-contrast cardiac MRI using native T1 and T2 mapping shows promise in distinguishing cardiac amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). These techniques offer valuable supportive data when contrast agents are not an option.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Differentiating cardiac amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is clinically challenging, particularly when contrast-enhanced MRI is contraindicated.
- Non-contrast cardiac MRI parameters, specifically native T1 and T2 mapping, were evaluated for their diagnostic utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic performance of non-contrast cardiac MRI parameters (native T1 and T2 mapping) in differentiating clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis from HCM.
- To explore the utility of these parameters in scenarios where contrast agents cannot be used.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective single-center study involving 20 patients with suspected amyloidosis, 20 with HCM, and 20 healthy controls.
- Analysis of cine imaging and native T1/T2 mapping, including myocardial, blood-pool, and liver values.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine discriminatory performance.
Main Results:
- Patients with suspected amyloidosis exhibited significantly higher myocardial, blood-pool, and liver T1 values, and higher myocardial T2 values compared to HCM and control groups (p < 0.001).
- Myocardial T1 (AUC = 0.938) and blood-pool T1 (AUC = 0.900) showed strong discriminatory performance for differentiating suspected amyloidosis from HCM.
- Elevated NT-proBNP and troponin levels were observed in the suspected amyloidosis group, indicating myocardial stress.
Conclusions:
- Native T1 and T2 mapping can provide valuable supportive information for differentiating suspected cardiac amyloidosis from HCM using non-contrast MRI.
- Myocardial and blood-pool T1 values offer complementary tissue characterization, beneficial when gadolinium contrast or invasive procedures are not feasible.
- Further validation in larger, multicenter, biopsy-confirmed cohorts is warranted to establish the role of non-contrast mapping in the diagnostic workup.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Differentiating clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains a significant clinical challenge, especially when contrast-enhanced imaging is contraindicated. This study evaluated the potential diagnostic utility of non-contrast cardiac MRI parameters, specifically native T1 and T2 mapping, as supportive indicators in this differential diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 20 patients with clinically suspected amyloidosis (based on combined clinical and echocardiographic assessment), 20 patients with HCM, and 20 healthy controls. Cine imaging and native T1/T2 mapping were analyzed. Myocardial, blood-pool, and liver T1/T2 values, along with morphological parameters, were recorded. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin levels, when available, were documented retrospectively for descriptive purposes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the discriminatory performance of imaging parameters. Results: Patients in the suspected amyloidosis group demonstrated significantly higher myocardial, blood-pool, and liver T1 values, as well as higher myocardial T2 values, compared with both the HCM and control groups (p < 0.001). Myocardial T1 showed strong discriminatory performance for differentiating suspected amyloidosis from controls (cut-off 1061 ms, AUC = 0.975). In distinguishing suspected amyloidosis from HCM, blood-pool T1 (AUC = 0.900) and myocardial T1 (AUC = 0.938) provided the highest diagnostic performance. Additionally, elevated NT-proBNP (>1000 pg/mL in 93% of tested cases) and troponin levels were observed in the suspected amyloidosis group, consistent with increased myocardial stress. Conclusions: Native T1 and T2 mapping may offer valuable supportive information in differentiating clinically suspected amyloidosis from HCM on non-contrast MRI. Myocardial and blood-pool T1 values appear to provide complementary tissue characterization, which may be particularly useful when gadolinium administration or invasive procedures are not feasible. These findings suggest a role for non-contrast mapping in the diagnostic workup but require further validation in larger, biopsy-confirmed multicenter cohorts.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
