Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
Microbial Diversity in Airport Terminal Environments and Potential Aerosol Transmission Risks
Zhuo Na Zhang1, Qin Wang1, Xiao Yan Dong1
1National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100021, China.
Objective:
To characterize the distribution of bacterial and fungal pathogens in airport terminal environments, compare airborne aerosol sampling methods, identify high-abundance pathogenic species based on the WHO priority pathogens list, and provide a scientific basis for optimizing microbiological monitoring and control measures.
Methods:
Sampling was conducted in the transit transfer area (A1), domestic arrivals area (A2), and domestic departures area (A3). Airborne aerosols were collected using cyclonic and filtration samplers, and surface samples were collected using sterile swabs. DNA analysis was performed using 2bRAD sequencing for microbiome profiling (2bRAD-M). Microbial community diversity and compositional differences were assessed using α-diversity indices (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) and β-diversity metrics.
Results:
Bacteria dominated the indoor air microbiota of the airport terminal (98.4%), with Pseudomonadota (39.4%-62.9%) and Actinomycetota (18.9%-32.9%) as the predominant phyla. Microbial diversity was significantly higher in surface samples than in airborne aerosols. High-frequency contact surfaces (e.g., handrails) were enriched with human commensal bacteria, including Cutibacterium acnes (9.71%-19.4%). Multiple WHO-prioritized pathogens were detected, including Acinetobacter baumannii (0.3%-1.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.01%-1.24%). The transit transfer area (A1), characterized by poorer ventilation, showed higher microbial richness. Filtration samplers captured more microorganisms per unit volume than cyclonic samplers, with significant differences in detection profiles.
Conclusion:
Sampling methods, sample types, and environmental conditions influence microbial distribution patterns across terminals. Detection of WHO Critical and High priority pathogens indicates potential risks of aerosol and contact transmission. Enhanced ventilation and disinfection of high-frequency contact surfaces can mitigate public health risks.
Graphical Abstract:
available in www.besjournal.com.
Related Concept Videos
Microbiota of the Respiratory Tract
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Microenvironments
Microbial Corrosion
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...

