Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture
Published on: February 23, 2018
Linearly Implicit Finite Element Methods Approximating the Solution to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a
Panagiotis Paraschis1,2, Georgios E Zouraris3
1Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Oscar-Morgestern-Platz 1, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
This study analyzes numerical methods for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation, presenting optimal error estimates for the Linearized Backward Euler finite element (LBEFE) and Linearized Crank-Nicolson finite element (LCNFE) methods. Numerical experiments validate the performance of these dissipative and conservative approaches.
Area of Science:
- Computational Mathematics
- Numerical Analysis
- Partial Differential Equations
Background:
- Nonlinear Schrödinger equations are crucial in modeling various physical phenomena.
- Accurate numerical solutions are essential for understanding complex behaviors.
- Existing methods may have limitations in terms of accuracy, stability, or applicability across different dimensions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and analyze finite element methods for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with specific boundary conditions.
- To derive optimal error estimates in both L^2 and H^1 norms for the proposed numerical schemes.
- To investigate the impact of dimensionality and time-step constraints on the accuracy of the methods.
Main Methods:
- Application of the Linearized Backward Euler finite element (LBEFE) method, a dissipative scheme.
- Application of the Linearized Crank-Nicolson finite element (LCNFE) method, a conservative scheme.
- Derivation of error estimates using mathematical analysis, considering time step (τ) and spatial mesh width (h).
Main Results:
- Optimal order error estimates of O(τ + h^2) in the L^2 norm for both LBEFE and LCNFE methods.
- Error estimates of O(τ^α + h) in the H^1 norm, with α = 3/4 for LBEFE and α = 1/2 for LCNFE.
- Identification of dimensionality-dependent mesh conditions for d=2, 3, while d=1 imposes no CFL conditions.
Conclusions:
- Both LBEFE and LCNFE methods provide accurate approximations for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation.
- The derived error estimates are optimal and depend on the chosen numerical scheme and spatial dimension.
- Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical findings and demonstrate the practical performance of the methods.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length, the...
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear.
Linearization and Approximation
Linear Differential Equations
Substitution Rule Applied to Indefinite Integrals