Handgrip strength as a valuable multidimensional clinical parameter: a cross-sectional Scopus-based analysis

This study aims to evaluate the bibliometric profile of handgrip strength (HGS) research using the Scopus database. A comprehensive search of the Scopus database was conducted on April 26, 2026. No temporal restrictions were imposed, and all publication types from 1944 to 2026 were included in the analysis. Publication trends over time were assessed using linear regression analysis. Distributions by country, institution, journal, author, funding source, and keywords were examined. The ten most cited publications were identified, and their bibliographic data were recorded. Countries contributing at least 1% of the total publications were designated as main active countries. Retracted publications in the dataset were categorized using a predetermined system based on the reasons provided in the retraction notifications. A total of 12,221 publications were included in the analysis. The literature, originating in 1944, reached its peak in 2025 with 1,553 publications. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant upward trend (B = 8.76; R² = 0.417; p < 0.001). Of the 128 countries contributing, the United States (n = 1979), Brazil (n = 1577), and China (n = 1115) accounted for the highest publication counts. The most prolific journals were Nutrients (n = 273), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (n = 241), and PLOS One (n = 223). The most frequently cited studies primarily addressed the diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia. The most productive institution was Universidade de São Paulo (n = 273), and the most prolific author was Izquierdo, M. (n = 74). Six publications were retracted, published between 2021 and 2023. The bibliometric analysis demonstrates a statistically significant upward trend in HGS research spanning more than eight decades. Contributions from 128 countries highlight the global scientific engagement in this field. The predominance of sarcopenia-related studies among the most-cited publications underscores the central role of musculoskeletal research in establishing HGS as a clinically recognized marker.