Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) with Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Midazolam versus dexmedetomidine: breakthrough use variations-the DREAMS trial secondary analysis
Benjamin Thomas1,2, Greg Barclay3,2, Kylie Mansfield2
1Division of Palliative Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia benjamin.thomas@health.nsw.gov.au.
Objectives:
Patients in the terminal phase may require both regular medications and breakthrough medications for palliative symptom management. Breakthrough dosing can provide an objective measure of symptom management, but the relationships between symptom severity and breakthrough use in sedated patients in the terminal phase remain unclear. This study examined the relationship between symptom management and breakthrough medication use in dying patients receiving dexmedetomidine or midazolam as background sedative infusions.
Methods:
This secondary analysis of the Dexmedetomidine for the Relief of End-of-life Agitation and optiMised Sedation trial included 52 palliative care inpatients randomised to subcutaneous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg/hour) or midazolam (0.25 mg/kg/day). Breakthrough medication use was correlated with Palliative Care Problem Severity Score (PCPSS) scores (0-3) using Spearman's coefficient. Primary analyses matched PCPSS-Pain with opioids, PCPSS-Psychological/Spiritual with sedatives and PCPSS-Other with other breakthrough medications, applying a Bonferroni correction (α=0.0083).
Results:
In total, 130 patient-days were analysed (71 dexmedetomidine, 59 midazolam). Symptom severity was mild and equivalent between arms (median PCPSS scores 0-1, all p>0.05). Total breakthrough doses were similar (2.5-3 daily). In the dexmedetomidine arm, PCPSS-Pain correlated with opioid use (r=0.46, p=0.001) and PCPSS-Psychological/Spiritual with sedative use (r=0.49, p=0.003), with a nonsignificant trend for PCPSS-Other (r=0.21, p=0.17). In the midazolam arm, correlations were absent or negative (r=-0.24 to 0.068, p>0.05).
Conclusions:
Dexmedetomidine patients showed significant correlations between symptom severity and breakthrough opioid or sedative use, whereas midazolam patients did not. Despite similar mild symptom scores and breakthrough needs, only dexmedetomidine demonstrated expected symptom-medication relationships. This divergence warrants further research.
Related Concept Videos
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines work by enhancing the effects of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. They bind to the GABAA receptor, increasing its affinity for GABA, which opens chloride...
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
CNS Depressants: Barbiturates and Benzodiazepines
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Barbiturates