Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Preparation of Complaint Matrices for Quantifying Cellular Contraction
Published on: December 14, 2010
Composition Matters: Collagen vs Polyacrylamide Modulates Distinct Trabecular Meshwork Cell Traction
Alireza Karimi1,2, Hasti Golchin1,2, Ansel Stanik3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, United States.
Abstract:
Cells actively sense not only substrate stiffness but also matrix architecture and composition. To understand how these factors play a role in mechanobiology while minimizing stiffness as a dominant variable, we cultured normal high-flow human trabecular meshwork (TM) cells on a fibrous type I collagen gel and a collagen-coated polyacrylamide (PAM) gel (nominal stiffness ∼4.7 kPa for PAM; collagen fiber stiffness characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM)) but with distinct microstructures, including a fibrous, elastic/viscoelastic type I collagen gel and an amorphous, linearly/non-linearly elastic polyacrylamide (PAM) gel. Using live 3D traction force microscopy and a traction-release (trypsin detachment) assay, we quantified cell-induced displacement fields and computed traction force distributions, strain, divergence (∇·u), and curl (∇ × u) on both gels. Across both gels, TM cells on collagen generated multi-fold higher tractions than on PAM throughout detachment; at 20 min, the median traction was ∼2.66 kPa (0.61-6.27 kPa) on collagen compared to ∼0.27 kPa (0.23-0.47 kPa) on PAM (∼9.8×). Median strain at 20 min was ∼1.31% (0.16-2.86) on collagen compared to ∼0.10% (0.076-0.163) on PAM (∼13×). Curl was consistently higher on collagen, i.e., 12 min medians: 4.24 compared to 0.27; ∼15×, whereas PAM remained near ∼0.3. Divergence stayed near zero on both substrates without a consistent negative shift on collagen. On collagen, traction tended to co-vary with weak divergence and higher curl over time, consistent with long-range force transmission and fiber recruitment, whereas on PAM, deformations were confined to the immediate adhesion footprint with minimal net divergence or rotation. Live confocal imaging and SEM corroborated distinct morphologies as elongated, fiber-aligned cells embedded within the 3D-like collagen network versus compact, uniformly spread cells on the planar PAM surface. Our data show that, with nominal stiffness approximately matched, switching from a collagen-coated 2D hydrogel to a fibrillar collagen matrix changes how TM cells generate, pattern, and transmit forces. These differences should be interpreted as the aggregate effect of the full matrix context rather than microstructure alone.
Related Concept Videos
Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces
Anchoring junctions mechanically attach a cell to the...
The Extracellular Matrix
The Extracellular Matrix
In order to maintain tissue organization, many animal cells are surrounded by structural molecules that make up the extracellular matrix (ECM). Together, the molecules in the ECM maintain the structural integrity of tissue as well as the remarkable specific properties of certain tissues.
Composition of the Extracellular Matrix
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is commonly composed of ground substance, a gel-like fluid, fibrous components, and many structurally and functionally diverse...
Extracellular Matrix
Collagens are the Major Structural Proteins of ECM
Connective tissue proper includes loose...
Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions

