Virtual Reality in Ophthalmic Surgical Education: Current Innovations and Future Perspectives

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies have recently gained momentum in medical education and show particular promise for ophthalmic surgical training. VR creates immersive, computer-generated environments for simulated learning, whereas AR enhances the real-world by superimposing interactive digital elements. Traditional microsurgical training relies on wet-lab practice using model or cadaver eyes, as well as operative experience on live patients. The educational value of wet-lab training often depends on time-intensive direct supervision by a senior surgeon, while early surgical experience on live patients is associated with higher complication rates among novice surgeons. Virtual reality technologies offer a structured learning environment in which ophthalmology residents can practice independently without relying on senior supervision or live patients. By expanding opportunities for early skills practice while reducing patient risk, these tools may serve as a valuable adjunct to supervised operative training during the initial stages of surgical skill acquisition. New applications are emerging for commercially available VR headsets such as the Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest, while standalone simulators like Haag-Streit Eyesi, HelpMeSee, and Alcon Fidelis have been developed specifically for ophthalmology. These platforms support immersive training environments, with tools such as RetinaVR for vitrectomy simulation and the AAO VR Education app for retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. The Apple Vision Pro, paired with the ZEISS Surgery Optimizer application, enables three-dimensional surgical video recording, supports case storage and review by trainees, and facilitates learning from procedures performed by experienced surgeons. Compared to traditional simulators, these innovations reduce cost and hardware barriers, while enhancing scalability and customization. Standalone simulators such as HelpMeSee offer validated modules for manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification, while Alcon Fidelis introduces high-fidelity haptics and foot-pedal functionality to simulate intraocular procedures. Many established simulators such as HelpMeSee and Eyesi demonstrate stronger evidence of construct validity, whereas newer consumer-based platforms currently have more limited ophthalmic validation. Looking ahead, the integration of artificial intelligence with VR systems may further personalize surgical education by analyzing surgical recordings to estimate complication risk and skill progression. In this Perspective article, we synthesize findings from peer reviewed studies alongside recent reports describing emerging VR platforms to compare levels of validation across technologies, identify current evidence gaps, and assess the potential of these immersive platforms to make surgical training more affordable, efficient, and widely accessible.