Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

05:44
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
Published on: January 12, 2017
Pilot Study: Postoperative Evaluation of Upper Extremity Lymphedema Using a Cutometer: A Single-center Prospective
Yushi Suzuki1,2, Hiroki Kajita1, Naoji Matsuhisa3
1From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|June 1, 2026
Summary
Skin viscoelasticity measurements using a Cutometer can objectively evaluate outcomes after lymphaticovenular anastomosis for lymphedema. Improved viscoelasticity indicates successful treatment, aiding patient care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Science
- Biomedical Engineering
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Lymphedema, characterized by lymphatic fluid congestion, presents significant skin stiffness.
- Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) offers symptomatic relief for lymphedema, but objective assessment of skin changes is lacking.
- Evaluating objective indicators for LVA outcomes is crucial for lymphedema management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify objective indicators for assessing the outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis in lymphedema patients.
- To explore the role of skin viscoelasticity measurements in evaluating LVA effectiveness.
- To enhance the objectivity of lymphedema assessments and postoperative evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Eleven female patients with unilateral upper extremity lymphedema post-LVA were grouped based on subjective symptom improvement.
- Skin stiffness and viscoelasticity were quantitatively measured using a Cutometer.
- Skin viscoelasticity was defined by the ratio of delayed to immediate deformation, reflecting tissue recovery dynamics.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in skin viscoelasticity were observed between the improved and unchanged LVA groups.
- The improved group demonstrated higher skin viscoelasticity values compared to the unchanged group.
- A significant difference in skin viscoelasticity was also noted between healthy and affected limbs in the unchanged group.
Conclusions:
- Skin viscoelasticity, measured by Cutometer, serves as a valuable objective indicator for LVA outcomes in lymphedema.
- This objective measurement can aid in monitoring lymphedema progression and treatment effectiveness.
- Implementing Cutometer assessments can improve the objectivity of lymphedema evaluations, enhancing patient care and surgical outcomes.

