Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Considerations in Designing Clinical Trials of Novel Antibacterial Agents Using a Superiority Design
David L Paterson1,2, David Melnick3, Aaron Dane4,5
1ADVANCE-ID, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract:
Randomized controlled trials for the regulatory approval of antibacterial agents almost always use a noninferiority design. Indeed, this should always be the default option when clinical development of new antibacterial agents is being planned. However, a superiority design may need to be considered for "nontraditional" antibacterial agents that are added to standard of care therapy. Therefore, it is necessary to consider how superiority trials might best be designed. Based on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator (CARB-X) antibacterial development discussions, we outline some key considerations for evaluable study populations, trial design, endpoints, and regulatory liaison in the context of superiority trials for new antibacterial agents.
Insights
For new antibacterial agents, noninferiority trials are standard. However, superiority trial designs are crucial for novel agents added to standard care, requiring careful planning for populations, endpoints, and regulatory engagement.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Trial Design
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for antibacterial agent approval typically employ noninferiority designs.
- Noninferiority is the standard default for planning new antibacterial agent development.
- Nontraditional antibacterial agents, used as adjuncts to standard care, may necessitate superiority trial designs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline key considerations for designing superiority trials for new antibacterial agents.
- To inform the development of clinical trials for novel antibacterial therapies.
- To address the specific challenges of evaluating adjunct antibacterial treatments.
Main Methods:
- Discussion and synthesis of insights from Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator (CARB-X) antibacterial development meetings.
- Framework development for superiority trial design in antibacterial research.
- Review of critical trial components including population, design, and endpoints.
Main Results:
- Identified essential considerations for superiority trial design in antibacterial development.
- Highlighted the need for specific approaches for adjunct therapies.
- Emphasized the importance of regulatory liaison in trial planning.
Conclusions:
- Superiority trial designs are a necessary consideration for specific classes of new antibacterial agents.
- Careful planning regarding evaluable populations, trial design, and endpoints is vital for successful superiority trials.
- Strategic regulatory engagement is crucial for advancing novel antibacterial therapies through superiority trials.
Related Concept Videos
Antibiotic Selection
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

