Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Compacting Factor test01:22

Compacting Factor test

The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It isĀ  especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online versus telehealth delivery of a parenting program for postdeployed military families: Child internalizing and externalizing symptoms as moderators of response.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychologyĀ·2026
Same author

Enhancing Physiological Complexity Through Mindfulness: A Wearable-Based Intervention for First Responders and Their Partners.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Ā·2026
Same author

Participatory cultural adaptation of a multigenerational mindfulness-based program for war-exposed families with refugee status.

Global health promotionĀ·2026
Same author

Modular item response and structural equation modelling via measurement and uncertainty preserving parametric modelling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychologyĀ·2026
Same author

The Effectiveness of the Parent Support Program: a Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Intervention to Increase Parental Support Among Parents and Caregivers of Trans and Nonbinary Youth.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention ResearchĀ·2026
Same author

Effects of the ADAPT Military Parenting Program on Parenting Behaviors in a Subsample of Deployed Mothers.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention ResearchĀ·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Advantages in Bayesian Approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Diana Alvarez-Bartolo1, Cheuk Hei Cheng2,3, Roy Levy2,4

  • 1School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. dalvar16@jh.edu.

Prevention Science : the Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research
|June 4, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian methods offer advantages for prevention researchers evaluating interventions. These methods improve interpretation, handle uncertainty, avoid estimation issues, and allow flexible measurement invariance testing compared to frequentist approaches.

Keywords:
BayesFactor analysisPsychometricsStatistics

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Prevention Science
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Rigorous evaluation of preventive interventions requires establishing psychometric quality of measures.
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is commonly used but faces challenges within the frequentist framework, such as sample size and measurement invariance (MI) requirements.
  • Bayesian methods offer potential advantages but are underutilized in prevention science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate the advantages of Bayesian methods over frequentist approaches for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in prevention research.
  • To demonstrate how Bayesian methods enhance result interpretation, uncertainty expression, and estimation.
  • To showcase flexible approaches to measurement invariance (MI) and the incorporation of prior information using Bayesian techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Application of Bayesian methods to Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using data from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ).
  • Five illustrative examples demonstrating specific advantages of Bayesian approaches.
  • Comparison of Bayesian results with traditional frequentist (maximum likelihood) methods.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian methods provide clearer interpretation of results and better expression of uncertainty compared to frequentist approaches.
  • Bayesian analysis helps circumvent common estimation problems encountered in frequentist CFA.
  • Flexible examination of parameter measurement invariance (MI) is facilitated, alongside the integration of prior substantive information.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian methods offer significant advantages for prevention scientists conducting psychometric evaluations and other statistical analyses.
  • Researchers are encouraged to consider adopting Bayesian methods for CFA to overcome limitations of frequentist approaches.
  • The illustrated examples highlight the practical benefits of Bayesian analysis for applied research in intervention science.