Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Chemically-blocked Antibody Microarray for Multiplexed High-throughput Profiling of Specific Protein Glycosylation in Complex Samples
Published on: May 4, 2012
Systematic identification of human anti-mouse antibody interference causing falsely elevated B-type natriuretic
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shaoxing Second Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Heterophilic antibody interference can cause false elevations in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) tests, leading to misdiagnosis. This case highlights human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) interference as a cause of unexplained high BNP levels.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Immunology
- Cardiology
Background:
- B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a key biomarker for diagnosing heart failure.
- Immunoassays used for BNP testing are susceptible to interference from heterophilic antibodies.
- Such interference can result in false-positive findings and inappropriate clinical management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate a case of markedly elevated BNP in a patient with an incongruent clinical presentation.
- To identify the cause of unexplained high BNP levels and establish a diagnostic workflow.
- To demonstrate the impact of human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) interference on immunoassay results.
Main Methods:
- Stepwise investigation including serial dilution, cross-platform comparison, and heterophilic blocking reagent testing.
- Dose-dependent evaluation of purified mouse IgG and specific blocking reagents.
- Confirmation of interference through normalization of BNP levels.
Main Results:
- A 36-year-old female presented with significantly elevated BNP (2735.7 ± 54.3 pg/mL) inconsistent with her clinical status.
- Serial dilution showed non-linear recovery, and an alternative platform yielded normal results.
- Treatment with purified mouse IgG normalized BNP levels, confirming HAMA interference.
Conclusions:
- Heterophilic antibody interference, specifically HAMA, is a potential cause of unexplained elevations in clinical immunoassay results.
- A systematic approach is crucial for identifying and confirming immunoassay interference.
- Accurate diagnosis and avoidance of unnecessary interventions are facilitated by understanding and addressing assay interference.
More Related Videos
09:45Production of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Aminopeptidase N in the Porcine Intestinal Mucosal Epithelium
Published on: May 18, 2021
06:15Characterization of Thymus-dependent and Thymus-independent Immunoglobulin Isotype Responses in Mice Using Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Published on: September 7, 2018