Regional excitability, not epileptic pathology, drives stimulation-evoked interictal spike increases

Interictal spikes have been proposed as a biomarker for both localizing seizure onset zones (SOZ) and tracking changes in seizure risk with neurostimulation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Electrical stimulation can modulate spike rates acutely, and it has been proposed that measuring this modulation can help localize the SOZ. However, it is unclear whether stimulation-induced spike rate changes reflect epilepsy-specific pathology in the stimulated network or simply intrinsic regional excitability, which limits our understanding of their utility in epilepsy surgery planning.

We analyzed low-frequency stimulation (LFS; 1 Hz) applied during a clinical seizure-induction protocol systematically targeting multiple brain regions in 43 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. A validated, automated spike detector was used to quantify pre-, during-, and post-stimulation spike rates. We tested whether the stimulation-evoked spike rate response (i) tracks the expected change in seizure risk from a seizure induction protocol, (ii) varies with anatomical stimulation site and epilepsy localization, (iii) localizes the SOZ beyond baseline spike rate, and (iv) is accompanied by changes in spike morphology.

Nearby LFS acutely increased spike rates in high-spiking channels (inter-stimulation median 2.25 vs. during-stimulation 4.25 spikes/min; p < 0.001), with effects attenuating with distance and resolving within approximately 30 seconds of stimulation offset. Mesial temporal lobe stimulation produced the largest increase in nearby spike rates relative to temporal neocortex and other cortex (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.003), but this effect did not differ between patients with and without mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. A random forest classifier incorporating stimulation-evoked modulation features achieved an AUC of 0.787, comparable to a resting-state spike model (AUC 0.747; DeLong p = 0.81), indicating that stimulation-evoked spike changes do not add localizing information beyond resting-state spike rates. Stimulation produced a small but significant shift in spike morphology toward broader, higher-amplitude discharges (PERMANOVA p < 0.001), consistent with recruitment of a broader neuronal population.

LFS-evoked increases in interictal spike rates reflect intrinsic regional excitability, greatest in the mesial temporal lobe, rather than epilepsy-specific pathology, and do not improve SOZ localization over resting-state spike rates. These results argue against using the change in spikes with stimulation to localize the SOZ. On the other hand, the transient spike rate increase induced by a pro-epileptic protocol supports the acute change in spike rate as a biomarker of the effect of stimulation on seizure risk, with potential to guide parameter selection for epilepsy neuromodulation.