Effect Size Rules of Thumb for One-Dimensional Functional Data With an Application to Gait Analysis
Todd Pataky1, Alessia Pini2, Ezio Preatoni3
1Department of Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Statistics in Medicine
|June 8, 2026
Summary
New rules for interpreting effect sizes in human movement data are proposed. Standard guidelines may misinterpret results, especially in post-surgery gait analysis, highlighting the need for context-specific interpretation frameworks.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Statistics
Background:
- One-dimensional (1D) functional data, such as joint angles in human movement, are commonly analyzed using scalar (0D) effect size rules of thumb (e.g., Cohen/Sawilowsky).
- Existing rules may overestimate effect sizes for functional data due to its inherent smoothness and greater probability of occurrence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose new, probabilistically consistent functional effect size rules of thumb for 1D human movement data.
- To develop a framework for adapting these interpretations to various experimental designs and data characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Developed functional effect size guidelines based on a benchmark two-sample scenario.
- Created a framework to adjust interpretations for different experimental designs (e.g., paired designs).
- Applied both standard and proposed methods to a total hip arthroplasty gait dataset.
Main Results:
- Standard Cohen/Sawilowsky rules yielded 'medium' and 'less than very small' interpretations for post-surgery gait data.
- Proposed functional rules initially suggested 'less than very small' effect sizes.
- Adapting the framework to the specific experimental case (n=52, smooth residuals) resulted in a 'very large' effect size interpretation.
Conclusions:
- Standard effect size guidelines are inadequate for functional data and arbitrary experimental scenarios.
- A single set of rules cannot be universally applied; context-specific interpretation is crucial.
- The proposed framework offers probabilistically consistent and more meaningful cross-study interpretations, especially for post hoc analysis.


