Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols and Lining Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Aged 3D-Printed Onlay
Ali A Elkaffas1,2, Abdullah Alshehri1, Hadi Alamri3
1Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Objective:
This in vitro study evaluated the effects of surface conditioning protocols and lining material type on fracture resistance and failure behavior of 3D-printed methacrylate resin onlay restorations.
Materials And Methods:
One hundred twenty 3D-printed onlays were fabricated and allocated to four surface conditioning protocols: no treatment, airborne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide (Al2O3), universal adhesive application, and combined Al2O3 abrasion followed by adhesive application. Each group was further subdivided according to the lining material used: bis-acryl composite, polymethylmethacrylate, or flowable composite (n = 10). Following surface conditioning and lining procedures, all specimens were subjected to thermomechanical aging. Fracture resistance was subsequently measured using a universal testing machine.
Results:
Two-way ANOVA revealed that the surface conditioning protocol (p < 0.001) and lining material (p < 0.001) had a significant influence on fracture resistance, with a significant interaction between the two factors (p = 0.003). Surface-treated specimens showed significantly higher fracture resistance than untreated controls (p < 0.05). The combined Al2O3 and adhesive protocol produced the highest fracture resistance values, although differences among surface-treated groups were not consistently significant (p > 0.05). Flowable composite liners demonstrated significantly higher fracture resistance than bis-acryl composite and polymethylmethacrylate across all protocols (p < 0.05), whereas polymethylmethacrylate showed the lowest values. Failure analysis revealed a shift from predominantly adhesive failures in control groups to mixed and cohesive failures in surface-treated specimens.
Conclusions:
Optimized surface conditioning combined with flowable composite lining enhances fracture resistance and interfacial integrity of 3D-printed resin onlay restorations.
Clinical Significance:
From the clinical perspective, enhanced surface conditioning accompanied by flowable composite lining seems to be an effective approach for augmenting the fracture resistance and longevity of repaired or relined 3D-printed resin onlay restorations postaging.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:37Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
Published on: June 6, 2025