Related Experiment Videos
Experiences from conducting systematic reviews of systematic reviews
Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten1,2, Tony Bohman3, Carina Bostrom4,5
1Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden. Wim.Grooten@ki.se.
Abstract:
This commentary discusses recent experiences from conducting two systematic reviews (SRs) of SRs. We address the strengths and limitations of conducting an SR of SRs in the field of evidence-based medicine in musculoskeletal health. Despite methodological challenges, we believe that SRs of SRs add value to the research community.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Ethics in Research
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs