Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in the SAFER Surgical System: Clinical Course and Predictors of Delayed Healing
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Youyu Zhang1,2, Weishi Wang3, Yongjun Yu4
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Huaxin Hospital (The First Hospital of Tsinghua University), Beijing, China.
Background:
Cervical anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a major complication after esophagectomy. We investigated the clinical course of cervical AL after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy within the SAFER surgical system and identified predictors of delayed healing.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 517 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction under SAFER between January 2023 and December 2025. Among them, 50 developed cervical AL. A posterior mediastinal comparator cohort of 37 patients with cervical AL was included for comparison of leak severity and healing outcomes. AL severity was assessed using ECCG and Clavien-Dindo classifications. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of time to closure.
Results:
In SAFER group, cervical AL occurred in 50 of 517 patients (9.7%). Compared with the historical same-surgeon PM leakage cohort, SAFER related leaks showed a lower severity profile, with fewer advanced ECCG events and a less severe Clavien-Dindo distribution. All SAFER group patients with cervical AL achieved eventual healing, and the median time to closure was shorter in the SAFER group. Low postoperative day 1 serum albumin (< 35 g/L) independently predicted delayed healing. Patients with low albumin had longer healing time and longer postoperative hospitalization.
Conclusions:
Within the SAFER surgical system, cervical AL after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy was predominantly low grade, manageable, and ultimately healed in all affected patients. Postoperative day 1 serum albumin may help identify patients at risk of prolonged recovery.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
