Impact of PDCA cycle optimization on door-to-wire time in patients with acute st-segment elevation myocardial

Xiao Chen1, Hongyan Xue2, Changqing Sun2

  • 1Department of nursing, SINOPHARM North Hospital, Baotou City, Inner Mongolia 014030, China.

Insights

A quality improvement initiative using the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle significantly reduced door-to-wire time for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. This optimization improved care efficiency without increasing adverse clinical events.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Health Systems Research

Background:

  • Reducing door-to-wire (D-to-W) time is crucial for enhancing patient care efficiency in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
  • Chest pain centers aim to streamline treatment pathways for STEMI patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle-based quality improvement (QI) initiative on D-to-W time.
  • To assess the effectiveness of QI in a Chinese chest pain center setting.

Main Methods:

  • A single-center, retrospective, before-and-after QI study involving 120 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
  • Comparison of standard care (control group, n=60) with PDCA-optimized care (intervention group, n=60).
  • PDCA intervention components included process mapping, root cause analysis, staff training, standardized communication, and a dedicated applicator.

Main Results:

  • Mean D-to-W time significantly decreased from 124.9 minutes (control) to 60.8 minutes (intervention) (p < 0.001).
  • The ECG-to-catheterization-laboratory activation segment showed the most substantial reduction (41.2%).
  • No significant differences in in-hospital mortality, acute heart failure, or reinfarction were observed between groups. Process indicators like ED bypass rate and response times improved.

Conclusions:

  • The PDCA-based QI initiative effectively reduced D-to-W time by optimizing critical STEMI workflow segments.
  • Further research with larger cohorts and longer follow-up is warranted to confirm clinical outcome benefits.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care01:28

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management01:26

Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management

Nursing Assessment:Nursing management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) involves taking the patient's history, focusing on primary complaints such as chest pain, dyspnea, and excessive sweating (diaphoresis), as well as other symptoms like back or jaw pain, nausea, vomiting, palpitations, dizziness, and fatigue. The nurse also reviews the patient's history of cardiac events, risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, family history, and current medications.In the objective assessment,...