Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
The Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Exam (MPJE): To RIP or Not to RIP
Jill Augustine1, Marina Gálvez-Peralta2, Meagan A Brown3
1Mercer University College of Pharmacy, USA.
Objective:
This narrative review aimed to discuss the utility of the Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE) as a licensure requirement and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of its elimination and to analyze the impact of alternative solutions to MPJE already implemented in different states.
Findings:
The current utility of MPJE has been questioned by various stakeholders. Currently, several states have either removed the law exam or adopted an alternative assessment to evaluate pharmacy law and regulation competencies. Proponents of removing the MPJE highlight the need to reduce barriers to licensure, challenge the utility of a single exam as a measurement of lifelong competency, and highlight the lack of evidence demonstrating that a single exam preserves patient safety. Advocates for keeping the MPJE exam propose modifying the current exam format and express their concern about eroding public trust with the removal of the exam.
Summary:
This paper provides a comprehensive, multifaceted analysis of the ongoing national debate surrounding the MPJE as a pharmacist licensure requirement, synthesizing perspectives from major stakeholder organizations and state-level policy changes. It advances the literature by proposing 4 concrete, evidence-based recommendations (reforming the MPJE, exploring alternative ongoing competency models, examining outcomes in states with different assessment methods, and reducing licensure barriers) that offer suggestions for guiding future policy decisions.
Insights
The Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE) is debated for pharmacist licensure. This review analyzes its utility, alternatives, and proposes recommendations for reform and competency assessment.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacy Practice
- Licensure and Regulation
- Health Policy
Background:
- The Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE) is a standard requirement for pharmacist licensure.
- Stakeholder concerns question the MPJE's utility and its role in assessing lifelong competency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the MPJE as a licensure requirement.
- To contrast the benefits and drawbacks of eliminating the MPJE.
- To analyze alternative assessment methods implemented in various states.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of existing literature and stakeholder perspectives.
- Analysis of state-level policy changes regarding pharmacy law exams.
- Synthesis of data on alternative competency assessment models.
Main Results:
- The MPJE's utility is increasingly questioned, leading some states to remove it or adopt alternative assessments.
- Arguments for removal focus on reducing licensure barriers and questioning the exam's predictive validity for patient safety.
- Advocates for retaining the MPJE suggest modifications and express concerns about public trust.
Conclusions:
- The ongoing debate necessitates a multi-faceted analysis of the MPJE.
- Recommendations include MPJE reform, exploring continuous competency models, and examining outcomes of varied assessment strategies.
- Policy decisions should consider reducing licensure barriers while ensuring public safety.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Excipients and Impurities-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Drug Regulation
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections

