Related Experiment Videos
Automated alerts and intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure monitoring gaps: a retrospective before-and-after
Kohei Ikeda1, Tsunehisa Tsubokawa2
1Department of Anesthesiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3- 19-18, Nishi-Shimbashi Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. kikeda.jk@gmail.com.
Background:
Intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring is recommended at least every 5 min during anesthesia, yet prolonged gaps between documented measurements still occur in routine practice. These gaps may reflect workflow interruptions, device-related factors, or failure to recognize outdated displayed values. We evaluated whether implementation of a vendor-embedded NIBP measurement gap alert was associated with fewer prolonged intraoperative NIBP monitoring gaps.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center, retrospective before-and-after study using anesthesia information management system data from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2024. A vendor-embedded on-screen alert was implemented on February 24, 2021, and was triggered when no NIBP value had been charted for ≥ 5 min. Eligible cases were anesthesiology-managed surgical cases without arterial catheter monitoring or continuous non-invasive finger-cuff monitoring. The primary outcome was the case-level occurrence of at least one ≥ 10-minute NIBP measurement gap (gap10). Secondary outcomes were the maximum NIBP measurement interval per case (gaptime) and the occurrence of a ≥ 20% systolic blood pressure (SBP) change across the maximum NIBP measurement interval. Multivariable models adjusted for prespecified case-mix covariates and calendar time.
Results:
The analytic cohort included 34,233 cases, comprising 15,186 pre-alert and 19,047 post-alert cases. Gap10 occurred in 1,890 cases (5.52%): 1,014 of 15,186 (6.68%) in the pre-alert period and 876 of 19,047 (4.60%) in the post-alert period. In adjusted logistic regression, the post-alert period was associated with lower odds of gap10 than the pre-alert period (odds ratio [OR], 0.673; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.499-0.906). In an adjusted Gamma model with a log link, the post-alert period was associated with a shorter expected gaptime (expected ratio, 0.951; 95% CI, 0.923-0.980). The post-alert period was also associated with lower odds of a ≥ 20% SBP change across the maximum NIBP measurement interval (OR, 0.796; 95% CI, 0.699-0.907).
Conclusions:
Among anesthetic cases without arterial catheter monitoring or continuous non-invasive finger-cuff monitoring, the alert was associated with fewer ≥ 10-min gaps, shorter maximum NIBP intervals, and lower odds of a ≥ 20% SBP change across the maximum NIBP interval.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment: