Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

The MODS method for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistant tuberculosis
Published on: August 11, 2008
Association of Positive mHealth Engagement with Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Total KAP Among Patients with
Huy Le Ngoc1, Giang Le Minh1, Hoa Nguyen Binh2
1School of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
None:
Background: Mobile health has been increasingly integrated into tuberculosis care to support patient education, communication, and treatment engagement. However, evidence remains limited regarding whether positive engagement with mHealth is associated with knowledge, attitudes, and practices among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. This study aimed to examine the association between positive mHealth engagement and knowledge, attitude, practice, and total KAP among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the engagement score used as the primary exposure variable. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. A positive mHealth engagement score was constructed from 12 mHealth-related items after harmonizing item directionality so that higher scores indicated more favorable engagement. The 12 items reflected five behavioural domains: intensity of use, ease and acceptability of use, functional engagement (communication with providers, access to health information, and perceived benefit for disease self-management), continuity of use, and barriers to sustained engagement. The composite score was computed as the mean of the 12 standardised items, with higher values indicating more positive engagement. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations, and structural validity was explored using principal component analysis. Adjusted linear regression models were used to examine associations between the engagement score and Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and total KAP scores, controlling for age, sex, and occupation. Sensitivity analyses were performed after excluding a poorly performing item, and tertile analyses were used to assess dose-response patterns. Results: The positive mHealth engagement score showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.852. One item demonstrated poor psychometric performance, and Cronbach's alpha increased to 0.864 after its exclusion. The data were suitable for dimensionality assessment, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.870 and a significant Bartlett's test. Principal component analysis identified a dominant first component explaining 43.29% of the total variance. Using the refined score, higher positive mHealth engagement was significantly associated with higher Knowledge scores (β = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.28-2.85; p < 0.001), higher Attitude scores (β = 4.68; 95% CI: 3.30-6.06; p < 0.001), and higher total KAP scores (β = 6.68; 95% CI: 4.62-8.74; p < 0.001), whereas no significant association was observed for the Practice score (β = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.63 to 0.49; p = 0.804). In tertile analyses, Knowledge, Attitude, and total KAP scores increased significantly across engagement levels, while Practice scores did not. Conclusions: Positive mHealth engagement was associated with better knowledge, attitudes, and overall KAP among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, but not with practice. These findings are associative; the cross-sectional design does not permit causal conclusions. The engagement score demonstrated good reliability and acceptable structural validity and may be a useful summary measure for evaluating patient interaction with mHealth interventions in tuberculosis care. Integrated strategies combining mHealth with clinical follow-up, adherence counseling, and structural support may be needed to translate informational and attitudinal gains into practice change.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the progression...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
