Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

09:32
Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
Post-EVAR Endoleaks: A Morphovolumetric Approach to Prediction, Surveillance, and Management
Emre Külahcıoğlu1, Sinan Özçelik2, Nuh Can Koçak2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kilis Prof. Dr. Alaeddin Yavaşca Devlet Hastanesi, Kilis 79000, Turkey.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|June 12, 2026
Summary
Preoperative morphovolumetric analysis predicts endoleaks and reinterventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Volumetric assessment offers early insights into sac remodeling, complementing diameter-based surveillance for improved patient management.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
- Quantitative Analysis
Background:
- Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a common treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
- Post-EVAR surveillance traditionally relies on diameter measurements, potentially missing subtle sac changes.
- Preoperative patient and aneurysm characteristics may influence EVAR outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if preoperative morphometric and morphovolumetric parameters predict post-EVAR sac remodeling, endoleak occurrence, and need for secondary interventions.
- To evaluate the utility of volumetric analysis in post-EVAR surveillance.
- To assess the role of specific endoleak subtypes in patient survival.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 383 patients undergoing elective EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
- Inclusion of pre- and postoperative computed tomography angiography with at least 1 year of follow-up.
- Analysis of diameter- and volume-based sac dynamics using 3D morphovolumetric measurements; regression and survival analyses for endoleak risk, secondary interventions, and survival.
Main Results:
- Endoleaks occurred in 26.1% of patients, most commonly type II (12.3%).
- Secondary interventions were needed in 14.1% of patients, primarily for type I and III endoleaks.
- Significant predictors of endoleak included dual antiplatelet therapy, aneurysm length > 133 mm, elevated D-dimer, aneurysm diameter > 59 mm, aneurysm volume > 164 cm³, and thrombus volume > 89 cm³.
- A 10% increase in aneurysm volume correlated with a 4 mm increase in diameter (R² = 0.72, p < 0.001).
- Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without endoleaks, but worse survival was noted for type Ia and III endoleaks.
Conclusions:
- Preoperative morphovolumetric parameters are significant predictors of post-EVAR endoleaks and secondary interventions.
- Volumetric analysis may offer an early indicator of aneurysm sac remodeling, complementing diameter-based assessments, especially for type II endoleaks.
- Prospective validation of proposed volumetric thresholds is necessary before routine clinical use; integrated management considering endoleak subtype and morphovolumetric factors is recommended.