Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
Management of type II endoleak after EVAR: Risk assessment and surveillance
Garip Altıntaş1, Alp Yıldırım2, Sinan Özçelik3
1Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Background:
Type II endoleak (T2EL) is the most frequently reported complication following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Although generally considered benign and often self-limiting, spontaneous resolution does not always occur, and secondary intervention may be required. In this study, morphological and morphovolumetric parameters were compared between patients who developed T2EL and those without endoleak, in order to identify predictors of T2EL development in the pre-EVAR period. Additionally, our experience in the management of T2EL was reviewed in the context of the existing literature.
Methods:
A total of 472 patients who underwent EVAR were initially evaluated. After exclusion of other endoleak types, 408 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 53 (13%) developed T2EL. The no-endoleak group comprised 355 patients (87%). Overall, T2EL accounted for 45.2% of all detected endoleaks. Primary endpoints were the identification of factors influencing T2EL development and the assessment of morphological and morphovolumetric parameters associated with endoleak formation. Secondary endpoints included secondary intervention rates, as well as post-EVAR mortality and morbidity.
Results:
No early mortality was observed. The mean follow-up duration was 33.2±21.2 months (median: 25 months; range: 12-99 months). All patients had at least one year of follow-up. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified age, antiplatelet therapy regimen, inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) diameter, number of patent lumbar arteries, thrombus localisation, and the intraluminal thrombus-to-aneurysm volume ratio as significant predictors of T2EL development. Late mortality for the entire cohort was 23.0%, with cardiac-related causes being the most common (11.0%). Mean intensive care unit stay was 5.2±5.1 hours, and mean hospital stay was 2.6±1.0 days.
Conclusion:
Although EVAR effectively reduces aneurysm diameter and volume during follow-up, the presence of T2EL may limit this benefit. Lumbar arteries were the most common source of T2EL. An IMA diameter >3 mm, female sex, double antiplatelet therapy, presence of four or more lumbar arteries, absence of coronary artery disease, and thrombus characteristics were associated with increased T2EL risk. D-dimer appears to be a useful biomarker for T2EL detection. Morphovolumetric analysis is more sensitive than maximum diameter measurement in the surveillance of low-flow endoleaks.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
