Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Production and Analysis of Sporosarcina pasteurii Biocement Bricks Using Custom 3D-Printed Molds for Unconfined Compression Tests
Published on: March 7, 2025
Comparative Evaluation of Packing Models for Mix Design and Performance Optimization of Ceramsite-Modified
Wanqing Zhou1, Liangcheng Wang1, Mengjie Jiang1
1College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China.
This study introduces a new mix design for lightweight ultra-high-performance concrete (LUHPC) using ceramsite sand. The compressible packing model (CPM) offers superior mechanical properties and lower density compared to the modified Andreasen packing model (APM).
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Civil Engineering
- Concrete Technology
Background:
- Lightweight aggregates (LWAs) like ceramsite sand have porous structures and high water absorption, challenging conventional mix design for lightweight ultra-high-performance concrete (LUHPC).
- Existing methods may underestimate powder content, affecting the accuracy of LUHPC mix design.
- Need for optimized mix design strategies for ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a suitable mix design method for ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC.
- To compare the effectiveness of the modified Andreasen packing model (APM) and the compressible packing model (CPM) for LUHPC mix design.
- To investigate the influence of steel fiber content on the properties of ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC.
Main Methods:
- Utilized ceramsite sand as the lightweight aggregate.
- Combined excess paste theory with particle packing methods (APM and CPM) for mix design.
- Optimized particle size distribution of ceramsite sand and binder composition.
- Systematically investigated workability, apparent density, mechanical properties, elastic modulus, and shrinkage with varying steel fiber content.
Main Results:
- CPM resulted in a denser aggregate skeleton with approximately 3.5% lower skeleton packing volume than APM.
- CPM-designed LUHPC exhibited superior mechanical properties (compressive, tensile, flexural, shear strength) compared to APM-designed mixtures.
- CPM-2.0 LUHPC achieved 124.6 MPa compressive strength at 1982 kg/m³ density; CPM-3.0 reached 131.7 MPa.
- Increased steel fiber content (1.5% to 3.0%) improved mechanical properties and slightly increased elastic modulus, while decreasing workability and showing diminishing returns for shrinkage restraint.
Conclusions:
- The compressible packing model (CPM) is more suitable than the modified Andreasen packing model (APM) for designing ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC.
- A steel fiber content of approximately 2.0% is recommended for balancing mechanical performance, shrinkage control, and material economy in ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC.
- The developed mix design method provides guidance for optimizing LUHPC performance.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability
To address...
Pozzolans
Fly ash is a...
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...
Workability of Concrete
Concrete's workability is determined by its resistance to internal forces that arise when...
Impact Strength of Concrete
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...

