Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of UTI and CAUTI in a Mouse Model
Published on: June 23, 2015
Antimicrobial Resistance and Clinical Outcomes of Uropathogenic Enterococcal Infections in Hospitalised Patients
Sujata P Korochikar1, Priyanka M Mane1, Satish R Patil1
1Department of Microbiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Abstract:
Introduction Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are important opportunistic pathogens causing urinary tract infections (UTIs) and are increasingly associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to evaluate the AMR patterns and clinical outcomes of uropathogenic Enterococcus species in hospitalised patients and to correlate resistance profiles with demographic and clinical parameters. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Southwest Maharashtra from October 2023 to October 2025. Thirty Enterococcal urinary isolates from hospitalised patients were analysed using standard microbiological techniques in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 guidelines. Parameters such as the Antimicrobial Resistance Index (ARI), the Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index (MARI), and resistance categories were assessed in relation to clinical factors. Results Enterococcus species isolates accounted for 30/490 (6.12%) of the inpatient culture-positive urine specimens, with 14 (46.7%) E. faecalis and 16 (53.3%) E. faecium. E. faecium showed 16 (100%) resistance to antimicrobials such as β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin, and high-level streptomycin (HLS), whereas E. faecalis showed comparatively lower resistance, including three (21.4%) to β-lactams. Both species were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. Multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pandrug-resistant (PDR) phenotypes were more common in E. faecium than in E. faecalis. XDR isolates had the longest hospital stays, whereas non-MDR E. faecalis had the shortest. Complicated UTIs (cUTIs) were the most common type. Overall, 23 (76.7%) patients showed improvement, 3 (10%) left against medical advice (LAMA), and 4 (13.3%) died due to renal disease and geriatric comorbidities in MDR/XDR infections. Conclusion E. faecium showed comparatively higher resistance than E. faecalis, necessitating species-specific antimicrobial treatment. Targeted vigilance is required, especially for high-risk groups with device-related infections, uropathy and obstetric conditions. Antimicrobial stewardship and surveillance are essential for improving patient outcomes.
Insights
Enterococcus faecium exhibits higher antimicrobial resistance than Enterococcus faecalis in urinary tract infections. Species-specific treatment and antimicrobial stewardship are crucial for managing these resistant pathogens and improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Clinical microbiology
- Infectious diseases
- Antimicrobial resistance
Background:
- Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are opportunistic pathogens causing urinary tract infections (UTIs).
- Increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in these species poses a significant clinical challenge.
- Understanding resistance patterns is vital for effective treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate AMR patterns and clinical outcomes of uropathogenic Enterococcus species in hospitalized patients.
- To correlate resistance profiles with demographic and clinical parameters.
- To inform targeted treatment and surveillance strategies for Enterococcus UTIs.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study of 30 Enterococcal urinary isolates from hospitalized patients.
- Analysis using standard microbiological techniques and CLSI M100 guidelines.
- Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance Index (ARI) and Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index (MARI).
Main Results:
- Enterococcus species accounted for 6.12% of inpatient UTIs; E. faecium (53.3%) was more prevalent than E. faecalis (46.7%).
- E. faecium showed 100% resistance to beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin, and high-level streptomycin; E. faecalis had lower resistance (21.4% to beta-lactams).
- Both species remained susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. Multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pandrug-resistant (PDR) phenotypes were more common in E. faecium. XDR isolates correlated with longer hospital stays.
Conclusions:
- E. faecium demonstrates significantly higher antimicrobial resistance compared to E. faecalis, necessitating species-specific treatment approaches.
- Targeted vigilance is crucial for high-risk groups, device-related infections, and specific conditions like uropathy and obstetric complications.
- Antimicrobial stewardship and robust surveillance are essential for improving patient outcomes in Enterococcus UTIs.
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
