Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

In 1971, Peter Perlman and Eva Engvall developed an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA or EIA). ELISA differs from western blot in that the assays are conducted in microtiter plates or in vivo rather than on an absorbent membrane.
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or quantified.

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Protein Abundance of Hydrolytic Drug Metabolizing Enzymes in Different Tissues and across Species.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026

Same author

Characterizing Multifunctional Mesoporous Cerium Silicate Nanoparticles for Potential Use in Bioactive Dental Materials: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Nationwide spread of multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae across US communities.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Characterization of Lysosomal Hydrolases and Transporters and Their Age-Dependent Variability: Relevance to Drug Metabolism and Transport of Small Molecule and Biologic Drugs.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026

Same author

An Oxymetazoline-Based Hemostatic Solution Used with MTA for Pulpal Therapy: A Retrospective Study.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Performance of the Vitek 2, Sensititre, and Etest antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems for isolates of <i>Burkholderia cepacia</i> complex.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

Stool antigen-based enzyme immunoassays: performance evaluations and automation.

Jian R Bao¹, Robert S Jones¹

¹Quest Diagnostics Inc, Chantilly, Virginia, USA.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

|June 12, 2026

Summary

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) effectively detect Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Campylobacter in stool. Automation improves efficiency for high-volume labs but may not be cost-effective for smaller ones.

Keywords:

EIA automation enzyme immunoassay (EIA)stool pathogen antigen detection

More Related Videos

Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology

Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology

Published on: May 23, 2025

Procedure and Key Optimization Strategies for an Automated Capillary Electrophoretic-based Immunoassay Method

Procedure and Key Optimization Strategies for an Automated Capillary Electrophoretic-based Immunoassay Method

Published on: September 10, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology

Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology

Published on: May 23, 2025

Procedure and Key Optimization Strategies for an Automated Capillary Electrophoretic-based Immunoassay Method

Procedure and Key Optimization Strategies for an Automated Capillary Electrophoretic-based Immunoassay Method

Published on: September 10, 2017

Area of Science:

Clinical microbiology
Diagnostic immunology

Background:

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is a standard method for detecting gastrointestinal pathogens in stool samples.
Accurate and efficient detection of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Campylobacter is crucial for diagnosing diarrhea diseases.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the performance of three EIAs for detecting Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Campylobacter in stool samples.
To assess the impact of automation (DS2 system) on the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of these EIAs.

Main Methods:

Three EIAs were tested on two platforms each, comparing results to reference methods like direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) testing, microscopy, and culture.
Automation of these EIAs and five others was evaluated on a DS2 system against manual methods.

Main Results:

Cryptosporidium EIAs showed 100% agreement with DFA and high correlation with microscopy.
Giardia EIAs had 100% positive concordance but moderate correlation with microscopy.
Campylobacter EIAs demonstrated 93.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
Automated EIAs achieved 92.5-100% accuracy and 100% precision, saving labor time for high-volume runs.

Conclusions:

EIAs are reliable for detecting protozoan parasites in stool, with Cryptosporidium EIA showing potential as a semi-quantitative assay.
Automation enhances efficiency in high-throughput laboratories but may not be cost-effective for low-volume settings.