Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis using a smartphone home sleep video score

N Saroul1, J E Petersen1, C Lambert2

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, University of Auvergne, INRAE, UNH, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Insights

A new smartphone video scoring system shows promise for diagnosing pediatric obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). This home sleep video recording (HSVR) method offers a potential accessible tool for identifying this common childhood sleep disorder.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Sleep Medicine
  • Respiratory Medicine
  • Diagnostic Technologies

Background:

  • Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is a significant pediatric condition.
  • Traditional diagnosis relies on polysomnography (PSG), which can be resource-intensive.
  • Home sleep video recordings (HSVR) offer a more accessible alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability of a smartphone-based video scoring system for diagnosing pediatric OSAHS.
  • To assess the diagnostic accuracy of HSVR compared to established clinical methods.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective multicenter clinical trial involving children suspected of OSAHS.
  • Respiratory polygraphy (RP) was performed for diagnosis.
  • Parents recorded 10-minute HSVRs, with a specific minute marked for symptom severity.
  • A 10-minute (VS10) and 1-minute (VS1) video score were derived and compared to RP results.

Main Results:

  • The VS10 achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.76 for OSAHS diagnosis and 0.85 for moderate-to-severe OSAHS.
  • The VS1 demonstrated an AUC of 0.71 for OSAHS and 0.81 for moderate-to-severe OSAHS.
  • Results were compared against clinical examination, sleep questionnaires, and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from RP.

Conclusions:

  • A smartphone HSVR-based video score is a promising tool for detecting pediatric OSAHS.
  • This method could improve accessibility to OSAHS diagnosis in children.
  • Further research with pre- and post-intervention comparisons is recommended to enhance clinical utility.
Abstract