Geographic and Racial Disparities in Maternal and Infant Mortality Rates Across U.S. States: A Population-Based

Erin I Duffy1, Diamond Posley2, Irene Li2

  • 1Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.

Cureus
|June 15, 2026
PubMed

Background Maternal and infant mortality remain critical indicators of population health in the United States, with persistent geographic and racial/ethnic disparities. Although these outcomes are often examined separately, less attention has been given to whether jurisdictions with higher infant mortality also experience higher maternal mortality. This ecological, jurisdiction-level study evaluated recent patterns in maternal and infant mortality across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, examined geographic and racial/ethnic disparities, and assessed the association between infant mortality rate (IMR) and maternal mortality rate (MMR). Methods This population-based analysis used publicly available Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER data. The primary jurisdiction-level analysis used pooled 2020-2024 infant and maternal mortality data to assess overall geographic patterns and the association between IMR and MMR. Secondary race/ethnicity-specific analyses used pooled 2020-2023 data because CDC Linked Birth/Infant Death Records were available through 2023. Race/ethnicity categories included non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI), and non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN). IMR was calculated per 1,000 live births, and MMR per 100,000 live births. Pearson correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used. Results Using pooled 2020-2024 data, overall IMR ranged from 3.43 to 9.04 deaths per 1,000 live births, with the lowest rates in Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New Hampshire and the highest in Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana. Overall, MMR ranged from 0.00 to 41.76 deaths per 100,000 live births; zero and low-count values were interpreted cautiously because maternal mortality is rare and jurisdiction-level estimates may be unstable. The lowest reported MMRs were in Vermont, California, and Utah, and the highest were in Tennessee, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The South had the highest mean IMR and MMR, while the Northeast had the lowest. In secondary 2020-2023 race/ethnicity-specific analyses, disparities persisted across expanded racial/ethnic categories, although jurisdiction-level estimates for smaller groups were limited by low counts and data suppression. Black populations had higher IMR and MMR than White and Hispanic populations. AIAN and NHOPI populations also had elevated aggregate infant mortality, and AIAN populations had elevated aggregate maternal mortality. Male infants had higher mortality than female infants. Overall, IMR and MMR were positively correlated across jurisdictions. Conclusions Geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in maternal and infant mortality remain substantial in recent U.S. data, with the greatest burden concentrated in Southern jurisdictions and among Black populations. Elevated rates were also observed among AIAN and NHOPI populations, where data were available. The jurisdiction-level association between IMR and MMR suggests that these outcomes may share overlapping population-level determinants, although causal or individual-level inferences cannot be made from this ecological analysis. Future studies should examine structural, socioeconomic, and healthcare-system factors that may explain the parallel distribution of maternal and infant mortality across jurisdictions.

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Applications of Life Tables01:22

Applications of Life Tables

Life tables are versatile across various fields, providing a quantitative basis for analyzing mortality and survival rates. Whether used by demographers, actuaries, epidemiologists, or sociologists, life tables offer valuable insights into the dynamics of life and death, facilitating informed decisions in public health, insurance, conservation, and beyond. Their broad applicability highlights the interconnectedness of demographic data with practical outcomes in everyday life and strategic...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...