Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
An Assessment of Racial Disparities in Pretrial Decision-Making Using Misclassification Models
Kimberly A Hochstedler Webb1,2, Sarah A Riley3, Martin T Wells1
1Department of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Pretrial risk assessment tools show racial bias. The Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument (VPRAI) has differing accuracy by race, and judicial decisions result in higher wrongful detention rates for Black defendants.
Area of Science:
- Criminal Justice
- Data Science
- Sociology
Background:
- Pretrial risk assessment tools are widely used to predict failure to appear (FTA) or reoffense.
- Concerns exist regarding potential bias against minority groups in algorithmic risk assessments and judicial decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the accuracy and fairness of the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument (VPRAI).
- To examine racial disparities in algorithmic risk assessments and subsequent judicial decisions.
Main Methods:
- Developed methods to assess the association between risk factors and pretrial failure.
- Estimated misclassification rates of risk assessments and judicial decisions based on defendant race.
- Utilized outcome misclassification methods and simulation studies.
Main Results:
- The VPRAI algorithm demonstrated near-perfect specificity but varying sensitivity across racial groups.
- Judicial decisions exhibited racial bias, with higher wrongful detention rates for Black defendants (51.4%) compared to white defendants (39.7%).
Conclusions:
- Pretrial risk assessment algorithms and judicial decision-making processes show evidence of racial bias.
- The VPRAI's accuracy varies by race, and judicial decisions lead to disproportionately higher wrongful detentions for Black individuals.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Halo Effect
Regression Toward the Mean
Stereotype Content Model
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
